Improved Monocyte in the Transport of Drug into The Brain Pilot Plant Scale up for Tablet
Saloni Sharma*, Amit B. Patil, DV Gowda
Department of Industrial Pharmacy, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka – 560078, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: salpalrockzz@gmail.com, amitbpatil@jssuni.edu.in, dvgowda@jssuni.edu.in
ABSTRACT:
The study is enlisted about the capability of the monocytes and its derivated macrophages (MDM) to travel through the CNS system for the drug disposition and to overcome all the barriers that come in between during the drug transportation into the brain to prevent and to reduce brain inflammation during monocyte transferring drug at the site of inflamed brain of the mouse. Preparation of mouse monocytes are also shown as cell carriers for drug disposition in case of mouse its in the bone marrow region. Different toxic effects, biological mechanisms and in vitro and in vivo were studied. To prevent the attack of these effects in the brain, different technologies were improved to administer monocyte-derived drug carriers. Administration of a formulation of the drug was introduced eg. Serotonin at the site of the affected region was examined for its healing effects in the mouse. Its body distribution, drug penetration, drug composition qualitative and quantitative analysis were studied. The mechanism of brain transport is also illustrated.
KEYWORDS: Monocyte, Transport of Drug, Brain
INTRODUCTION:
Drug transport is not allowed entry into the brain and other transverse tissues by The Blood Brain Barrier. It precisely gets accumulated in the targeted region or the diseased site passing through the different membranes, physiological organs and tissues by the monocytes and monocytes derived macrophages(1).This activity improves the action of the cell-based system by the macrophages and the monocytes. Movement of drug and other monocytes cannot transport into the brain easily due to the presence of BBB and hence detection of diseases in the brain aren’t known. Hence, to overcome this problem the brain tissue is hypothesized into surveillance to study the innate system, targeted brain diseases and tissue coagulation with the help of monocytes, MDM and neutrophils.
One major drawback was found that the presence of BBB reduced to production and development of new drugs into the brain innate system hence it was designed as neutrophils, monocytes and MDM to improve the metabolism in the brain by the following 2 observations[i] :the brain is under immunological surveillance and the other is that new drugs are administered in the form of monocytes, neutrophils, and MDM. They have the ability to accumulate the drug in the CNS targeted site and reduce the effects in the brain during drug disposition without affecting the metabolism(3). Therapeutic and biological compounds are known to pass through the BBB which leads to its limitation in the property due to the requirement of basic cell-based systems is necessary to overcome the CNS diseases. Afergan et al., determined to enhance phagocytosis by monocytes that are innate in texture, relatively large size and negatively charged (4). These activated derived compounds deploy the affected region and erode the liposomal layer and the discharge their drug into the brain. The choice of serotonin was done in order to improve the phagocytic system for drug carriers like monocytes because it had the ability to reduce the diseased states of the brain. However, it was noted that the formulation of the new drug did not produce new cells but it energized the monocytes and other MDM to transport the drug into the brain(5).
Isolation and Cultivation of Mouse Monocytes
Cell donors were used in form eight to ten-year-old mice. This mouse were used as monocytes. From the other researches, it was proved that the experiment was performed by isolating the bone marrow cells (BMC) by isolation process(6). Erythrocytes are were cut open by lysis method with the use of ACK lysis buffer and a suspension of single-celled molecule was obtained by passing through 30-μm strainers and was then again suspended in PBS and performed for Intravenous infusion of the cell(7).
Medium consisting with 11%FBS and 1,100 U/ml M –CSF was used, under the temperature of 37 degrees, with 5%of carbon – di-oxide,28 days before the cytological analysis of the mouse monocytes cells. In studies using freshly mouse monocytes using EsaySep monocyte utilization kit. Manufacturers Stem cell methodologies were used based on the instructions given by the specific manufacturers(8).
Blood Monocytes
Monocytes are defined as blood molecular cells which contain a nucleus in a bean-shaped shell producing expressions of CD11B, CD14, CD11C in humans and also produces expressions such as CD 11B in mice. Monocytes are usually similar to each other but they have different functions to perform due to the presence of Peripheral Blood Smears(1).
The mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS) are specialized tissues distributed all over the body and composed of differential cells. The different organs the drug passes are Kupfer cells and Osteoclasts. Monocytes belong to the family of Leukocytes, that divide monocytes and get released through the bloodstream as non-dividing cells and enter tissues(9).
Peripheral Blood Monocytes are heterogeneous in nature adoptive murine –adsorptive transfer system to initiate monocyte homing. Two functional subsets were identified during this process; which are the subunits under murine –derived subsets short-lived ones CX3CR5, CCR3GR9 subsets are differentiated by the dependence on the non– inflamed tissues. The amount of CX3CR3 present is related to the 2 major human monocytes subsets i.e, CD14, CD16 monocytes which share phenotype and homing potential abilities.
THE DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE TRANSFER OF MONOCYTES INTO THE BRAIN FOR DRUG DELIVERY
TRANSFER OF ANTIGEN TARGETTED T-cells
Cells were marked by Intracellular Fluorescent coloring agent (Carboxy fluorescein) by incubation in the absence of serum for an 8min rate at 10 cells/ml in 5M CFSE and was prohibited due to an equal concentration.
The cells were kept for washing two times under RPMI medium to 10 the power 8 clonotype. Recipient mice thio-glycollate IP were immunized by Ovalbumin peptide. After 60 hours, the lymph nodes were ejected and T cells were analyzed for intensity by CD44, CD9, and TCRV-2 Anti-bodies(10).
The Kupfer cells constituting in the organoleptic regions are also a part of MPS. Monocytes are randomly scattered in the connective tissue of the liver cells, spleen and lymph nodes, lungs, and central nervous system(11).
2) PERTUSSIS –TOXIN TREATMENT OF MONOCYTES
Pertussis toxin is a composition of a protein-based AB5-type exotoxin produced from the bacterium called as Bordetella pertussis, that causes a chronic cough.PT is responsible for the urinary tract infection that is caused by lack of drug-blood disposition into the body(12).
Blood monocytes were obtained from RAGCX3 mice were attacked by 1-A and collect cells by immune-magnetic cells depletion to perform the procedure. Monocytes were to washing and then responded in 10% of the RPMI fatal diseases(13).
ANALYSATION OF THE BRAIN TRANSPORT OF THE DRUG FURTHER SUBJECTED HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
From the review of other studies, it was noted that the obtained from the organs were rinsed in PBS saline solution, placed on slide for 45 minutes at 4C of 6% para-formaldehydekept under incubation throughout the entire night at 4C 30% sucrose washed again in PBS embedded and frozen 50 microns were sent for analysis by fluorescent microscopic method. Axioplan 2 fluorescent microscopic technique was also required for producing visual data using a CCTV camera for slide book data(14).
FORMULATION OF DRUG SEROTONIN FOR TRANSFER OF DRUG TO THE BRAIN
DELIVERY OF DRUG TO THE BRAIN WITH THE HELP OF MONOCYTES
The brain .consists of extracellular complex, endothelial cells and extracellular tight junctions at varied levels and inhibits pinocytic activity at its reduced levels through which saline solutions are passed through in order to prevent from enzymatic action that is prone to decompose the drug complex(15), inclusive of products from biotech technology or gene therapy, this prevents the blockade of the BBB and were found more efficient pathophysiological conditions when the permeation capacity of BBB increased(16).
However, it was proved that the brain was kept for immune study. The BBB allows only certain types of monocytes and neutrophils to enter into the CNS including monocytes, neutrophils, and lymphocytes action in the CNS organs(17). Hence, they are the most suitable preferred in getting the desired outcome of phagocytosis in the circulation of the drug by this specific monocyte action. The formulation disposition should not activate any new cells it should metabolize the conduction of the drug into the brain-specific site. If the monocyte and drug complex isn’t formulated in the brain. It is then excreted from the endocytic region of the brain(18).
THE DIFFERENT STUDIES OF THE DRUG FORMULATION
Qualitative brain penetration
Liposomal quantitative analysis for performed in brain tissue of rabbits (n=9) denoting by fluorescent indicators. Animals were labeled in group wise (Rhodamine-DSPE, membrane marker), double-labeled and multi labelled fluorescence inhibiting monocytes of Rhodamine and 1-hydroxy-pyrene-3, 6, 8 tri -sulfonic acid (hydrophilic core marker), Rhodamine- liposomal alendronate with the required quantity with a control group of physiological saline solution. The animals were dissected 4 h post-injection after that the brain tissue was soaked in saline solution, after that it was frozen in the liquid nitrogen solution, and was stored at a temperature of 60 °C until analysis was completed. Tissues were divided into 2 phases, and then it was mounted on slides and recorded by the use of confocal microscopy(19).
Serotonin liposomes
It was founded that Brain under immunological surveillance could not transport the drug directly into the brain due to the presence of BBB ,hence phagocytic cells in the form of monocytes and phagocytes like Serotonin formulation was induced into the brain to improve absorption of the drug ,hence : the formulation consisted of di-stearoyl phosphatidylcholine, di-stearoyl phosphatidyl glycerol maintained a ratio of 2:2:1, size of 169.33± 36.33 nm, produced zeta potential of −25±1.8 mV, and an 11% encapsulation maintaining a concentration of 50mM. The formulation was stable, without any leakage of drug dose, no rendering of any chemical reactions and no decomposition of any compounds(20).
Brain transport
Qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed to study the brain penetration with the hydrophobic molecule (Rhodamine-DSPE) and hydrophilic substrate (1-hydroxypyrene3, 6, 8 tri -sulfonic acid) fluorescent indicators attached to the liposomal membrane and aqueous core. The liposomes containing both the stains were transported to the brain. The resulted images are shown below the intact of the brain with liposomes(21).
The circulation of phagocytic cells that are mono-nuclear in nature, Nano – sized liposomes which have negative charge in its molecular form, were formulated and then encapsulation was performed using a suitable material such as serotonin, a BBB impermeable neuro- drug(22). In vitro and in rats and rabbits by utilizing double-radiolabeled 3H in the membrane and 14C-serotonin in the core was used to study the Brain uptake, bio-distribution, and the mechanism of brain transport , and liposomes with fluorescent markers to denote the membrane and its core were studied(23). Since treatment of animals which was performed by liposomal alendronate that resulted in the inhibition of monocytes neutrophils were not generated, and with no drug deposition in the brain delivery, it was suggested that the monocytes were the main transporters of liposomes and the drug deposition into the brain tissue(24).
Fig. 1
Quantitative analysis was also performed for the liposomal intact to the brain. Serotonin drug formulated was more in content than the normal saline physiological solution.
Fig 2.
Serotonin concentration in the brain approx. was found to be 4h as 0.138%±0.034 and 0.068%±0.02, for the concentration serotonin liposomes and serotonin in solution, respectively(24).
Body distribution
Validation of intact serotonin was done by administering the double layered-radiated-labelled liposomes, 14C-serotonin and 3H lipids. Site of administration of organs was measured for 3H to 14C ratio normal to that of the injection dose with a ratio of be1:1(25). Incomparable faults were detected in the 3H and 14C counts in the sites of kidneys, pancreas, spinal cord, liver. These findings resulted indicated that the liposomes that were intact agglomerated in these respected organs(26). Higher counts of 3H than 14C were rendered in the lungs, spleen, and liver CNS organs which indicated the serotonin elimination from these specific metabolic organs followed by drug degradation and monocyte count of the drug molecule(10).
The greatest risk for ADEs due to unusually high concentrations occured when there was the following conditions are both met together:
1. The drug when is eliminated by single metabolic pathway
2. There is a sleek margin between the concentrations required for the efficacy and those that will produce toxicity(23).
The extent of liposome endocytosis using neutrophils and moving monocytes with the help of granulocytes(6). Analysis of mice (n=4) blood 3.5hrs post-administration of monocytes labeled with dextran-FITC demonstrated that liposomes, monocytes and granulocytes were respectively. Further, 24 h and 48 h post-injection, 16.4%±0.2 and 14.6%±13 of monocytes are shown in fig 2 and 3 respectively.
Fig 3. Credits to Eyal Afergan, Hila Epstein for diagrematic representation of serotonin liposomes(11)
There was a high risk produced during this stage because of the inhibition of a single pathway in (condition 1) which lead to a pointed elevation of the levels of concentration in the drug, and in (condition 2) then resulted in the high risk of ADEs. Common mechanisms which used this specific inhibition method like genetic factors disease-related excretory organ dysfunction, and interacting drugs(9).
Receptor-mediated
RM endocytosis uses the specific receptor-ligand interactions that occurs in the BBB and uses them for to complete the active transport medium of macromolecules that cannot use passive diffusion method to diffuse through the BBB(20). In this study, the emphasis was stressed on CNS systems that used transferrin, insulin, and low density lipoprotein receptor mediated regimens; however, there were new targets for drug disposition which continually explored throughout the desired site of administration. Recent advances were produced in transferrin, peptide-receptors, and various antibody-ligand targeting systems (27). This study includes those systems that were used in the phrase, “Trojan Horse” as their mode of drug disposition whereas the endogenous trafficking pathways across the BBB were exploited to deliver therapeutic cargo drug deposit. Brain barriers do much more than the division of the CNS from the peripheral system of circulation. They were also critical in the CNS homeostasis, nutrition, and brain–body communication. (26). Features that aid in these functions are transcellular diffusion and soluble drug transport via using its solute carriers, receptor-mediated transcytosis method of distribution, and adsorptive endocytosis absorption(25).
Uptake of liposomes by monocytes and neutrophils
Confocal microscopy and flow cytometry were used for obtaining the entrapment efficiency of the drug with the monocytes and liposomes. Endocytosis was produced by circulating monocytes using confocal microscopy 4 h post-IV injection to mice (Fig. 4) left(20). Later it was studied about the stains of the neutrophils and monocytes after the appearance of fluorescence color (Fig. 4).Examination of the liposomal endocytosis by the monocytes and macrophages that occurred with the help of granulocytes(21).
Fig 4. Credits to, Nickolay Koroukhov, Keren Rohekar for the study of human and rabbits cells rate of monocyte delivery drug distribution(28).
Convection enhanced delivery
Current methods for treating gliomas involved a suitable collision of surgery, radiation, and implantation of chemotherapeutic agents. One common chemotherapeutic agent used in the clinical studies are in the form of Gliadel® Drug form, which contains the chemotherapeutic agents that is Bi-Chloro ethyl nitro-sourea (BCNU) which was released from the wafer produced as it degraded and slowly penetrated through the surrounding tissues by the process of diffusion. BCNU molecules move into the surrounding tissue due to the concentration gradient created by the Gliadel® drug physiological solution. The drug is deposited through the monocytes are implanted following tumor resection with the goal of inactivating other remaining tumor cells that is surrounding the resection cavity of the brain (29). While Gliadel® drug substance is clinically used for the transport of drug molecule through other means of administration such as monocyte derived macrophages drug deposit. In order to help in the enhancement of penetration depth surface area of the drug into the tissue, Bobo et al. used a convection method in order to augment local distribution of drug by the infusion of the drug molecules directly into brain tissue(30). This technique, was hence denoted as convection enhanced delivery (CED), that provides a clinically stabilised drug level from the administered infusion site of action. CED has been proved as the mean of treating varied maladies in vivo. The drug regimen A was also conjugated directly of poly-lysine showing an inverse proportion relation between distributed volume and molecular weight of the drug; as a result it was proved to show tissue damage that was rendered for further study(31). CED combined with Gd-DTPA drug regimen was also used as an effective imaging tool and a merit in determining change in distribution in ischemic tissue with that of a healthy tissue(32). Due to the PEG coating, it enhanced the brain distribution by reducing certain specific interactions of tissues and receptors (33).
CONCLUSION:
Over the previous studies that have been performed to fully characterize the 4th transferred monocytes for their migration into the brain using neuro- inflammated mouse model and optimize the therapeutic delivery system, body distribution and drug permeation into the body and the CNS. One of the most important aspects that have to be developed for a successful system of brain neuron cells to increase the number of vehicles that can be administered into the brain, there was an increase of 4th adoptive infused cells. In addition, we also studied the transient disruption of the BBB (Blood Brain Barrier) using monocytes and liposomes as the carrier of the drug to the brain tissue. The ability of the monocytes to carry the monocytes and liposomes to the brain (CX3CR1, CD14, CD16, CR2GR1, etc.) Fourth adoptive Administration of negatively charged Serotonin liposomes was infused to the Brain exhibited of two forms i.e., free drug form and intact liposomes. This study has the potential to transport drug into the brain by inducing monocytes and monocytes derived macrophages that has the tendency to pass through the BBB for complete absorption to take place.
REFRENCES:
1. Wang B, Zuo J, Kang W, Wei Q, Li J, Wang C, et al. Generation of Hutat2: Fc Knockin Primary Human Monocytes Using CRISPR/Cas9. Mol Ther-Nucleic Acids. 2018;11:130–141.
2. Kulkarni R, Shetty SK, Rajarajeshwari NM, Rao PN, Nayan J. Rasayana herbs of ayurveda to treat age related cognitive decline: An update. Pharmacogn J. 2016;8(5).
3. Dou H, Grotepas CB, McMillan JM, Destache CJ, Chaubal M, Werling J, et al. Macrophage delivery of nanoformulated antiretroviral drug to the brain in a murine model of neuro AIDS. J Immunol. 2009;183(1):661–669.
4. Baba M, Dou H, Destache CJ, Morehead JR, Lee Mosley R, Boska MD, et al. Development of a macrophage-based nanoparticle platform for antiretroviral drug delivery. Commentary. Blood. 2006;108(8).
5. Pardridge WM. Drug targeting to the brain. Pharm Res. 2007;24(9):1733–1744.
6. Sato Y, Kiwada H, Kato Y. Effects of dose and vesicle size on the pharmacokinetics of liposomes. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 1986;34(10):4244–4252.
7. Rooijen van, Annemarie Sanders N. Elimination, blocking, and activation of macrophages: three of a kind? J Leukoc Biol. 1997;62(6):702–709.
8. Ajuebor MN, Flower RJ, Hannon R, Christie M, Bowers K, Verity A, et al. Endogenous monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 recruits monocytes in the zymosan peritonitis model. J Leukoc Biol. 1998;63(1):108–116.
9. Jamieson CH, Ailles LE, Dylla SJ, Muijtjens M, Jones C, Zehnder JL, et al. Granulocyte–macrophage progenitors as candidate leukemic stem cells in blast-crisis CML. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(7):657–667.
10. Kiertscher SM, Roth MD. Human CD14+ leukocytes acquire the phenotype and function of antigen-presenting dendritic cells when cultured in GM-CSF and IL-4. J Leukoc Biol. 1996;59(2):208–218.
11. Udenfriend S, Weissbach H, Bogdanski DF. Increase in tissue serotonin following administration of its precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan. J Biol Chem. 1957;224(2):803–810.
12. Terry RL, Getts DR, Deffrasnes C, Van Vreden C, Campbell IL, King NJ. Inflammatory monocytes and the pathogenesis of viral encephalitis. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9(1):270.
13. Prinz M, Garbe F, Schmidt H, Mildner A, Gutcher I, Wolter K, et al. Innate immunity mediated by TLR9 modulates pathogenicity in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(2):456–464.
14. Kao YJ, Juliano RL. Interactions of liposomes with the reticuloendothelial system effects of reticuloendothelial blockade on the clearance of large unilamellar vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA-Gen Subj. 1981;677(3–4):453–461.
15. Kao YJ, Juliano RL. Interactions of liposomes with the reticuloendothelial system effects of reticuloendothelial blockade on the clearance of large unilamellar vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA-Gen Subj. 1981;677(3–4):453–461.
16. Danenberg HD, Fishbein I, Gao J, Mönkkönen J, Reich R, Gati I, et al. Macrophage depletion by clodronate-containing liposomes reduces neointimal formation after balloon injury in rats and rabbits. Circulation. 2002;106(5):599–605.
17. Tong H-I, Kang W, Davy PM, Shi Y, Sun S, Allsopp RC, et al. Monocyte trafficking, engraftment, and delivery of nanoparticles and an exogenous gene into the acutely inflamed brain tissue–evaluations on monocyte-based delivery system for the central nervous system. PloS One. 2016;11(4):e0154022.
18. Prinz M, Hanisch U-K. Murine microglial cells produce and respond to interleukin-18. J Neurochem. 1999;72(5):2215–2218.
19. Epstein H, Berger V, Levi I, Eisenberg G, Koroukhov N, Gao J, et al. Nanosuspensions of alendronate with gallium or gadolinium attenuate neointimal hyperplasia in rats. J Controlled Release. 2007;117(3):322–332.
20. Opferman JT, Iwasaki H, Ong CC, Suh H, Mizuno S, Akashi K, et al. Obligate role of anti-apoptotic MCL-1 in the survival of hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 2005;307(5712):1101–1104.
21. Emerich DF. Recent efforts to overcome the blood-brain barrier for drug delivery. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2000;10(3):279–287.
22. Benveniste EN. Role of macrophages/microglia in multiple sclerosis and experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. J Mol Med. 1997;75(3):165–173.
23. Patel HM. Serum opsonins and liposomes: their interaction and opsonophagocytosis. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 1992;9(1):39–90.
24. Huitinga I, Van Rooijen N, De Groot CJ, Uitdehaag BM, Dijkstra CD. Suppression of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in Lewis rats after elimination of macrophages. J Exp Med. 1990;172(4):1025–1033.
25. Priller J, Flügel A, Wehner T, Boentert M, Haas CA, Prinz M, et al. Targeting gene-modified hematopoietic cells to the central nervous system: use of green fluorescent protein uncovers microglial engraftment. Nat Med. 2001;7(12):1356.
26. Ahsan F, Rivas IP, Khan MA, Suárez AIT. Targeting to macrophages: role of physicochemical properties of particulate carriers—liposomes and microspheres—on the phagocytosis by macrophages. J Controlled Release. 2002;79(1–3):29–40.
27. Rodrigueza WV, Pritchard PH, Hope MJ. The influence of size and composition on the cholesterol mobilizing properties of liposomes in vivo. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA-Biomembr. 1993;1153(1):9–19.
28. Cornford EM, Hyman S. Blood–brain barrier permeability to small and large molecules. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1999;36(2–3):145–163.
29. Schackert G, Fan D, nayar R, Fidler IJ. Arrest and retention of multilamellar liposomes in the brain of normal mice or mice bearing experimental brain metastases. Sel Cancer Ther. 1989;5(2):73–79.
30. Thoma-Uszynski S, Kiertscher SM, Ochoa MT, Bouis DA, Norgard MV, Miyake K, et al. Activation of toll-like receptor 2 on human dendritic cells triggers induction of IL-12, but not IL-10. J Immunol. 2000;165(7):3804–3810.
31. Geissmann F, Jung S, Littman DR. Blood monocytes consist of two principal subsets with distinct migratory properties. Immunity. 2003;19(1):71–82.
32. Si Y, Tsou C-L, Croft K, Charo IF. CCR2 mediates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell trafficking to sites of inflammation in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(4):1192–1203.
33. Szoka Jr F, Papahadjopoulos D. Comparative properties and methods of preparation of lipid vesicles (liposomes). Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1980;9(1):467–508.
Received on 06.04.2020 Modified on 18.04.2020
Accepted on 05.05.2020 ©AandV Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech.2020; 12(2): 105-110.
DOI: 10.5958/0975-4377.2020.00019.1