Antianginal Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Formulation and Evaluation

 

Vaseeha Banu T.S.1*, Sandhya K.V.2 and K.N. Jayaveera3

1Department of Pharmaceutics, M.M.U College of Pharmacy, K.K. Doddi, Ramanagara- 562159. Karnataka.

2Department of Pharmaceutics, T. John College of Pharmacy, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore- 560083. Karnataka.

3Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu- 515002, Andhra Pradesh.

 

ABSTRACT:

Lercanidipine Hydrochloride (LH) is a calcium channel blocker used to treat hypertension along with chronic stable angina related to myocardial ischemia characterised by chest discomfort rather than actual pain. The main goal of the treatment of stable angina pectoris is to control symptoms, slow progression of the disease and reduction of major cardiovascular events. In our present investigation an attempt has been made to formulate transdermal drug delivery system of LH to treat angina pectoris. Transdermal films of LH have been formulated by solvent casting technique using three different polymers hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), ethyl cellulose (EC) and polyvinyl pyrrolidine (PVP) (blend ratios viz; 0.5:1.5, 1:1 and 1.5:0.5% w/v), of varying degrees of hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Propylene glycol (PG 30% w/w) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO 7% w/w) was incorporated as plasticizer and permeation enhancer respectively. The prepared films were evaluated for various physicochemical parameters and ex-vivo drug release through rat abdominal skin using Franz diffusion cell. The patch containing combination of HPMC:PVP shown maximum water vapour transmission rate, % moisture absorption and % moisture loss, which could be attributed to the hydrophilic nature of both the polymers. Ex-vivo data revealed that the released pattern from all the patches followed zero order; moreover it was sustained and extended over a period of 24 hours in all formulations. F7 emerged as the most satisfactory formulation by permeating drug upto 88.94%. Further the best formulation F7 was subjected to skin irritation studies, the results revealed that the F7 has no erythema and oedema.

 

KEYWORDS: Antianginal drug, DMSO, PVP, HPMC, EC

 

INTRODUCTION:

There has been increased interest and challenges in the delivery of an active ingredient through the skin. Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) are a class of novel drug delivery systems, which are going worldwide accolade as evidenced by the numerous scientific documents being published1. Delivery of drugs into systemic circulation via skin has generated a lot of interest during the last decade, as TDDS offers many advantages over the conventional dosage forms and oral controlled release delivery system. TDDS avoids hepatic first pass metabolism, decrease in frequency of administration, reduction in gastrointestinal side effects and improves patient compliance. In this type of dosage forms peak plasma levels of drug are reduced, leading to the decreased side effects and increase the therapeutic value for many drugs by avoiding specific problems associated with the drug.


Inspite of several advantages offered by transdermal route, only a limited number of drugs are administered transdermally because of the formidable barrier nature of stratum corneum. To overcome these problems vehicles, chemical penetration enhancers has been attempted in the development of TDDS2.

 

Most of the chronic diseases have genetic, hereditary cause or lifestyle borne like hypertension, asthma, diabetes, addiction etc. It is desirable, from the standpoint of pharmacodynamics to maintain the drug concentration in plasma within a therapeutic effective range for long periods3. However, even if the drug is well absorbed orally, it will run through entero-hepatic cycle. In some cases it decreases the systemic availability of drug as it undergoes hepatic first pass metabolism. This effect will establish a significant difference between claimed and attained bioavailability of drug moiety4.

 

Lercanidipine HCl (LH), a novel lipophilic and vasoselective dihydropyridine, calcium antagonist is effective as antihypertensive and antianginal agent 5, 6. Lercanidipine HCl is poorly absorbed after oral administration with peak plasma concentrations observed within three hours. Bioavailability of this drug about 44% and extensively metabolised in liver. The half life is about 4.6 hours. Lercanidipine HCl due to its low therapeutic dose (2.5-20mg) and substantial biotransformation in liver becomes an ideal candidate for development of TDDS 7, 8.

 

In this study we have attempted to develop TDDS of LH for the treatment of angina pectoris

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Lercanidipine HCl (LH) was obtained as a gift sample from Aurobindo Pharmaceuticals, Hyderabad. Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC) from NR Chemicals, Mumbai, Ethyl Cellulose (EC) and Propylene Glycol (PG) from Ranchem, New Delhi and Polyvinyl pyrrolidine (PVP) and Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) from S.D Fine Chemicals, Mumbai, India. All other ingredients used were of analytical grade.

 

Fabrication of transdermal film 9, 10

Solvent casting technique was employed for fabrication of transdermal films. Composition of LH transdermal films were shown in table 1. Accurately weighed quantities of drug and polymer were dissolved in ethanol at room temperature, PG as plasticizer (30%w/w) and DMSO as permeation enhancer (7%w/w) were added into the polymeric solution while continuously starring on magnetic stirrer for 30 min. The solution was poured into flat surfaced petridish and the solvent was allowed to evaporate at room temperature. An inverted funnel was placed over the petridish to prevent fast evaporation of the solvent. Films of 2 cm2 containing 15 mg of LH were cut and packed in an aluminium foil covering.

 

Evaluation of transdermal patches:

Physical appearance 11

The prepared patches were physically examined for colour, clarity and surface texture. 

 

Thickness uniformity12

The  thickness  of  patches  was  measured  by  using  slide caliper,  with  a  least count  of  0.01mm.  Thickness  was  measured  at  three  different  points  on  the  film  and average values were calculated.

 

Uniformity of weight13

The patches of size 2x2 cm were cut and weight of each patch was taken individually, the average weight of the patch was calculated. 

 

Drug content uniformity 11, 14

The patches were tested for the content uniformity. The patches of size 2 cm2 were cut and placed in a 100 ml volumetric flask. The contents were stirred using a magnetic bead to dissolve the patches. Subsequent dilutions were made with phosphate buffer (pH 7.4).  The  absorbance  of  the  solution  was  measured  against  the corresponding blank  solution  at  236  nm  using  UV-visible  spectrophotometer.  The experiment was repeated three more time to validate the result

 


 

Table No. 1: Composition of the transdermal patches

Formulation code

HPMC:EC % W/V

EC:PVP %W/V

HPMC:PVP % W/V

PG %W/W

DMSO%  W/W

F1

0.5:1.5

-

-

30

7

F2

1:1

-

-

30

7

F3

1.5:1.5

-

-

30

7

F4

-

0.5:1.5

-

30

7

F5

-

1:1

-

30

7

F6

-

1.5:1.5

-

30

7

F7

-

-

0.5:1.5

30

7

F8

-

-

1:1

30

7

F9

-

-

1.5:1.5

30

7

Drug loaded in each 2 cm2 = 15mg,


 

Tensile strength 15, 16

Tensile strength was measured using modified analytical two pan balance method. A patch of 20 mm width and 50 mm length was cut and clamped between two clamps on one side; until the patch breaks weight were added to the pan on other side. The required weight to break the patch was taken as a measure of tensile strength of the patch.

 

Folding endurance12,17,18

The folding endurance was measured manually for the prepared patches. A strip of patch  (2  x  2  cm )  was  cut  and  repeatedly  folded  at  the  same  place  till  it  was broken.  The number  of  times  the  film  could  be  folded  at  the  same  place  without  breaking  gave  the value of folding endurance.

 

Percentage moisture loss 18, 19

Three patches from each batch were weighed individually and the average weight was calculated. This weight was considered as an Initial weight. Then all the patches were kept in a desiccator containing activated Silica at normal room temperature for 24hr. The final weight was noted when there was no further change in the weight of individual patch. The percentage moisture absorption was calculated as a difference between initial and final weight with respect to final weight.

 

% Moisture content = [(Initial weight ~ Final weight)/ Final weight] X 100

 

Percentage moisture uptake20

The  patches  were  weighed  accurately  and  placed  in  a  desiccator where  a  humidity condition  of  80-90%  RH  was  maintained  by  using  saturated  solution  of  potassium chloride. The patches were kept until uniform weight is obtained, then taken out and weighed. The percentage of moisture uptake was calculated as the difference between final and initial weight with respect to initial weight.    

 

% Moisture absorption = [(Final weight – Initial weight)/ Initial weight] x 100

 

Water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) 21, 22 

For this study vials of equal diameter were used as transmission cells.  These cells were washed thoroughly and dried in an oven.  About  1 g  of fused calcium chloride was taken  in  cells and the polymeric patches  measuring 3.14cm2 area  were  fixed  over  the  brim  with  the  help  of  an  adhesive.  The  cells  were  weighed  accurately  and  initial  weight  was recorded, and  then kept  in a closed desiccator containing  saturated solution  of  potassium chloride  to maintain 80-90% RH.  The cells were taken out and weighed after 72 hrs. The amount  of  water  vapor  transmitted  was  calculated  by  the  difference  in  weight using the formula. Water vapour transmission rate is usually expressed as the number of grams of moisture gained/72 hr/cm2.

 

Ex-vivo permeation studies19:

Male rats weighing 105-120 gm, free from any visible sign of disease were selected. the hair on abdominal region was removed using a depilatory preparation one day prior to experiment. On the day of experiment, animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the abdominal skin was excised. The fatty material adhered to the dermis was carefully peeled off, The prepared skin was washed with pH 7.4 phosphate buffer and tied on the donor compartment with transdermal patch. Patch was placed in such a way that the stratum corneum was faced towards donar compartment while the dermis towards receptor compartment containing 100 ml of pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. At fixed time intervals the samples were withdrawn and replaced with receptor fluid. After 24 hours of sampling absorbance were measured at 236 nm against blank pH 7.4 phosphate buffer by UV spectrophotometer.

Primary skin irritation test 10.

 

This test is done by modifying the method describes by Draize and his colleagues in 1994, based on scoring method. Scores are assigned from 0 to 4 based on the severity of erythema or oedema formation. The safety of patch decreases with an increase in scoring.

 

The test was performed on six healthy rabbits weighing around 1.2 to 1.5 kg. the dorsal surface of the rabbits was cleared and the hair was removed by shaving. The skin was cleaned with rectified spirit. The patche (F7) was placed over the skin with the help of adhesive tape. They were removed after 24 hrs and the skin was examined for any untoward reaction. No signs of erythema, edema or ulceration was observed.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:

The solvent casting technique was used to prepare the transdermal films of LH. It was found that prepared films were transparent, smooth, thin and flexible. The physicochemical evaluation data revealed that there were no physical changes in terms of appearance, colour and flexibility at room temperature at which the films were stored. An ideal patch must be developed in a way so that it should have smooth surface which should not constrict for a given period of time. The result of flatness is shown in table 2, where low value of standard deviation indicates the uniformity of the patches. It was also clear from the flatness study that none of the formulation had much difference in the strip length before and after cutting. The flatness observed for almost all the patches was much closer to 100% which indicates a very little constriction in the film which in turn was the characteristic of smooth and flat surface of the patches and these formulations maintained uniform surface when they were applied on skin for evaluation.

 

The thickness of the transdermal films were found to be in the range of 0.024-0.026 mm among which the film prepared with polymer EC: PVP (0.5:1.5) had least thickness.

 

The folding endurance indicates the measurement of the ability of the patches to withstand the breaking or cracking during its usage. The folding endurance was measured manually and the results revealed that the patches had sufficient integrity. The value of folding endurance was found to be higher for the patches prepared with the combination of HPMC and PVP.

 

The tensile strength tells the strength of a patch while it is subjected for a tension. From the experiment it was found that the patch prepared with combination of PVP: HPMC (1.5:0.5) had highest tensile strength.

 

The data related to moisture content provides the information about the stability of the prepared formulation, especially when the inherent moisture present in the formulation may influence the stability of the dosage form and if the drug is sensitive to water. The results of the moisture content studies for all the formulations are shown in table 2. The data reveals that there was a small variation for all the formulations evaluated however there was an increase in moisture content with increase ratio of the hydrophilic polymer. The transdermal films were found to contain low moisture which in turn could help the patches to remain stable for a longer period of time. Moisture uptake also influences the stability of the dosage form. Low moisture uptake protects the material from the microbial contamination. So for transdermal patches it is necessary to determine the percentage moisture uptake of the matrices. The experimental data (Table 2) reflects that the moisture uptake of the transdermal patch was low which could also reduce the bulkiness of the film.

 

As expected the WVTR was found to be more for the formulations containing the hydrophilic polymer PVP. It may be attributed due to the fact that because of the more affinity of the films prepared with hydrophilic polymer PVP towards moisture.

 

A transdermal patch allows controlling the overall release pattern of the active molecule through an adequate and appropriate selection of the polymer, permeation enhancer, plasticizer with their combination and concentration. The various mechanistic pathways were generated due to the blend of the polymers to maintain the desired steady release of the drug from the patches. In vitro release profile is an important aspect for the evaluation of transdermal patches because it can predict that how a drug molecule will act in vivo. It is also required to approximately estimate the duration and rate of drug release. From the drug release pattern, it can be stated that the rate of drug release was rapid during the first two hours period which might be due to the rapid dissolution of the drug on skin surface, which in turn can prove useful for the dermal penetration of the drug. The drug release study of the formulations was found to show the release of drug loaded patches in the range of 77.96-88.94% as the concentration of hydrophobic polymer was decreased the amount of drug release was increased. This inversely proportional characteristic of the drug-polymer resembled the pattern like release unlike. This may be the result of the initial rapid dissolution of the hydrophilic polymers when the patch was in contact with the skin which in turn results the accumulation of high amount of the drug on the surface of the skin thus leads to the saturation with drug molecules.

 

Figure 1: Comparison of % moisture absorption of formulation F1 –F3

 

 


Table No. 2: Physicochemical evaluation of the prepared transdermal patches

Formu

lation

code

Weight variation

(mg)

% Flatness

Thickness

(mm)

Folding endurance

Tensile strength

Gm/10Cm2

Percent elongation

Drug content

(%)

Moisture content

(%)

Moisture absorption

(%)

WVTR

F1

26.50

 ± 0.40

99.12 ±0.25

0.025

 ± 0.003

102

± 10.8

15.44

± 0.42

10 ± 0.072

96.54

 ± 0.56

2.506

2.643

0.01692

F2

26.43

 ± 0.20

98.32 ±0.15

0.026

± 0.002

105

± 6.5 

15.13

± 0.23

9 ± 0.023

96.98

± 0.23

2.134

2.574

0.01680

F3

26.87

± 0.16

99.10 ±0.14

0.026

± 0.006

95

± 8.6

14.96

 ± 0.32

9 ± 0.045

97.35

± 0.11

1.983

2.321

0.01676

F4

25.95

 ± 0.12

98.17 ±0.25

0.024

± 0.003

119

± 10.6

15.58

 ± 0.85

11 ± 0.052

98.37

± 0.24

2.632

2.528

0.01704

F5

26.22

 ± 0.15

100.0 ±0.19

0.025

± 0.002

110

 ± 12.3

15.36

± 0.56

10 ± 0.051

97.95

 ± 0.32

2.628

2.632

0.01706

F6

26.68

± 0.12

99.25 ±0.56

0.026

± 0.005

111

± 8.5

14.32

± 0.68

10 ± 0.025

96.58

 ± 0.10

2.114

2.136

0.01694

F7

25.83

 ± 0.19

100.0 ±0.29

0.025

± 0.006

124

 ± 10.3

15.86

± 0.28

11 ± 0.041

98.69

± 0.31

2.642

2.864

0.01718

F8

25.98

 ± 0.36

98.23 ±0.43

0.025

± 0.002

124

± 11.5

14.89

± 0.27

10 ± 0.036

98.96

± 0.15

2.598

2.802

0.01717

F9

26.34

 ± 0.15

99.52 ±0.15

0.026

± 0.005

116

 ± 8.9

15.64

 ± 0.42

10 ± 0.054

97.42

± 0.21

2.631

2.624

0.01790


 

Figure 2: Comparison of % moisture absorption of formulation F4 –F6

 

Figure 3: Comparison of % moisture absorption of formulation F7 –F9

 

Figure 4: Comparison of WVTR of formulation F1 –F3

 

Figure 5: Comparison of WVTR of formulation F1 –F3

 

Figure 6: Comparison of WVTR of formulation F1 –F3

 

Figure 7: Percentage drug release of F7

 

CONCLUSION:

LH holds good promise for administration via transdermal route for the treatment of angina pectoris. The various physico chemical parameters that were evaluated helped to realize the suitability and usefulness of LH to be formulated as a transdermal film with different concentration and blends of the polymers. The effect of permeation enhancer (DMSO) and plasticizer (PG) used to prepare the transdermal film were found to be satisfactory. HPMC, EC and PVP polymer blends have the potential to formulate transdermal films as they have good film forming properties like flatness, thickness, folding endurance and moreover mechanical strength. However in a generalised manner a conclusion can be drawn that the selection of a particular polymer blend can vary the diffusion of the drug in a significant manner. Thus there may be an opportunity to modify the formulation composition like the ratio of polymer and permeation enhancer to get the optimum release for a longer period of time. Considering the experimental data polymer based transdermal patches containing permeation enhance i.e. DMSO can emerge as an efficient tool in drug delivery system for the treatment of angina pectoris, however the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of these formulations at pre clinical and clinical level is necessary to establish these findings.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Sanap G. S., Dama G. Y., Hande A.S., Karpe S. P., Nalawade S. V., Kakade R. S., Jadhav G. Y. Prepartion of transdermal monolithic system of idapamide by solvent casting method and the use of vegetable oils as permeation enhancer. Int. J. of Green Pharmacy 2008; 129-133.

2.       Mamatha T., Venkateshwara R., Mukkanti K., Ramesh G. Tansdermal drug delivery systems for atomoxetine hydrochloride invitro and ex vivo evaluation current trends in biotechnology and pharmacy. 2009; 3(2): 1-16.

3.       Sharad K., Govil. Transdermal drug delivery system, Drug Delivery Devices by Praveen tyle, 1987: 386-417.

4.       Chien, w. Yie, Novel drug delivery systems, Marcel and Dekker Inc., New York, 1987; 2-3, 149-153, 185-193.

5.       Giuseppe S., Silvia P. S., Cristina G. Cardiovascular safety of Lercanidipine in patients with angina pectoris: a review of six randomised clinical trials. Current therapeutic research 2001; 62(1): 3-15.

6.       Sasaki T., Maruyam H., Kase Y., Takeda S., Aburada M. Antianginal effects of Lercanidipine on vasopressin or methacholine induced angina model in rats. Bio. Pharm Bull 2005; 28(5): 811-816.

7.       Barachielli M., Dolfini E., Farina P., Leoni B., Targa G., Vinaccia V., Tajana A. Clinical pharmacokinetics of Lercanidipine. Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology. 1997; 29(P) S1-S15.

8.       James S., Kalus and Michael W. G. Alongacting dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker for treatment of hypertension 2002; 37: 234-238.

9.       Dang P.M., Manavi F.V., Gadag A.P., Mastiholimath V.S., Jagdeesh T. Formulation of transdermal drug delivery device of Ketotifen Fumarate  Indian Journal of  Pharmaceutical Science 2003; 65(3): 239-243.

10.     Jayaprakash S., Halith M.S., Firthouse P.U.M., Yasim M. Prepartion and evaluation of Celecoxib transdermal patches. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2010; 23(3): 279-283.

11.     Sanap  GS,  Dama  GY,  Hande  AS,  Karpe  SP,  Nalawade  SV,  Kakade  RS,  et  al. Preparation  of  transdermal  monolithic  systems  of  indapamide  by  solvent  casting method  and  the  use  of  vegetable  oils  as  permeation  enhancer.  Int  J  Green  Pharm  2008; 2:129-33

12.     Murthy TEGK,  Kishore  VS.  Effect of casting solvent on permeability of antihypertensive drugs through ethyl cellulose films. J Sci Ind Res 2008; 67:147-50.

13.     Patel HJ, Patel JS, Desai BG, Patel KD.  Design  and  evaluation  of  amlodipine besilate  transdermal  patches  containing  film  former.  Int  J  Pharma  Res  Dev  2009; 7:1-12.

14.     Rao V,  Mamatha T,  Mukkanti K and Ramesh. Transdermal drug delivery system for atomoxetine hydrochloride–in vitro and ex vivo evaluation. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy 2009; 3(2):188-96.

15.     Kulkarni RV, Mutalik S,  Hiremath D.  Effect of plasticizers on the permeability and mechanical properties of eudragit films for transdermal application. Ind J Pharm Sci 2002; 64(1):28-31.

16.     Panigrahi L,  Ghosal  SK.  Formulation and evaluation of pseudolatex transdermal drug delivery system of terbutaline sulphate. Ind J Pharm Sci 2002; 64:79-82.

17.     Murthy TEGK and Kishore VS.  Effect of casting solvent and polymer on permeability of propranolol hydrochloride through membrane controlled transdermal drug delivery system. Indian J Pharm Sci 2007; 69(5):646-50.

18.     Subramanian K,  Sathyapriya  LS,  Jayaprakash  S,  Prabhu  RS,  Abirami  A, Madhumitha B et al. An Approach to the formulation and evaluation of transdermal DDS of isoxsuprine HCl. Int J Pharm Sci Tech 2008; 1(1):22-8.

19.     Sankar V, Johnson DB, Sivanand V, Ravichandran V, Raghuraman, S, Velrajan G et al. Design and evaluation of nifedipine transdermal patches. Indian J Pharm Sci 2003; 65(5):510-5.

20.     Shinde AJ, Garala KC, More HN. Development and characterization of transdermal therapeutics system of tramadol hydrochloride. Asian J Pharm 2008; 2:265-69.

21.     Devi KV, Saisivam S, Maria GR, Deepti PU.  Design  and  evaluation  of  matrix diffusion  controlled  transdermal  patches  of  verapamil  hydrochloride.  Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2003; 29(5):495-503.

22.     Pandit  V,  Khanum  A,  Bhaskaran  S,  Banu  V.  Formulation  and  evaluation  of transdermal  films  for  the  treatment  of  overactive  bladder.  Int  J  Pharm  Tech  Res 2009; 1(3):799-804.

 

Received on 23.08.2013

Modified on 20.09.2013

Accepted on 27.09.2013     

© A&V Publication all right reserved

Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 5(6): November-December, 2013, 320-326