Antianginal Transdermal Drug Delivery System: Formulation and Evaluation
Vaseeha Banu T.S.1*, Sandhya
K.V.2 and K.N. Jayaveera3
1Department of Pharmaceutics, M.M.U College
of Pharmacy, K.K. Doddi, Ramanagara-
562159. Karnataka.
2Department of Pharmaceutics, T. John College
of Pharmacy, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore- 560083. Karnataka.
3Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu-
515002, Andhra Pradesh.
ABSTRACT:
Lercanidipine Hydrochloride (LH) is a calcium channel
blocker used to treat hypertension along with chronic stable angina related to
myocardial ischemia characterised by chest discomfort
rather than actual pain. The main goal of the treatment of stable angina
pectoris is to control symptoms, slow progression of the disease and reduction
of major cardiovascular events. In our present investigation an attempt has
been made to formulate transdermal drug delivery
system of LH to treat angina pectoris. Transdermal
films of LH have been formulated by solvent casting technique using three
different polymers hydroxy propyl
methyl cellulose (HPMC), ethyl cellulose (EC) and polyvinyl pyrrolidine
(PVP) (blend ratios viz; 0.5:1.5, 1:1 and 1.5:0.5%
w/v), of varying degrees of hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Propylene glycol (PG 30% w/w) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO 7% w/w)
was incorporated as plasticizer and permeation enhancer respectively. The
prepared films were evaluated for various physicochemical parameters and
ex-vivo drug release through rat abdominal skin using Franz diffusion cell. The
patch containing combination of HPMC:PVP shown maximum water vapour transmission rate, % moisture absorption and %
moisture loss, which could be attributed to the hydrophilic nature of both the
polymers. Ex-vivo data revealed that the released pattern from all the patches
followed zero order; moreover it was sustained and extended over a period of 24
hours in all formulations. F7 emerged as the most satisfactory formulation by
permeating drug upto 88.94%. Further the best
formulation F7 was subjected to skin irritation studies, the results revealed
that the F7 has no erythema and oedema.
KEYWORDS: Antianginal drug, DMSO, PVP, HPMC, EC
INTRODUCTION:
There has been increased interest and challenges in the
delivery of an active ingredient through the skin. Transdermal
drug delivery systems (TDDS) are a class of novel drug delivery systems, which
are going worldwide accolade as evidenced by the numerous scientific documents
being published1. Delivery of drugs into systemic circulation via
skin has generated a lot of interest during the last decade, as TDDS offers
many advantages over the conventional dosage forms and oral controlled release
delivery system. TDDS avoids hepatic first pass metabolism, decrease in
frequency of administration, reduction in gastrointestinal side effects and
improves patient compliance. In this type of dosage forms peak plasma levels of
drug are reduced, leading to the decreased side effects and increase the
therapeutic value for many drugs by avoiding specific problems associated with
the drug.
Inspite of several advantages offered by transdermal route, only a limited number of drugs are
administered transdermally because of the formidable
barrier nature of stratum corneum. To overcome these
problems vehicles, chemical penetration enhancers has been attempted in the
development of TDDS2.
Most of the
chronic diseases have genetic, hereditary cause or lifestyle borne like
hypertension, asthma, diabetes, addiction etc. It is desirable, from the
standpoint of pharmacodynamics to maintain the drug
concentration in plasma within a therapeutic effective range for long periods3.
However, even if the drug is well absorbed orally, it will run through entero-hepatic cycle. In some cases it decreases the
systemic availability of drug as it undergoes hepatic first pass metabolism.
This effect will establish a significant difference between claimed and
attained bioavailability of drug moiety4.
Lercanidipine HCl (LH), a novel
lipophilic and vasoselective
dihydropyridine, calcium antagonist is effective as
antihypertensive and antianginal agent 5, 6.
Lercanidipine HCl is poorly
absorbed after oral administration with peak plasma concentrations observed
within three hours. Bioavailability of this drug about 44% and extensively metabolised in liver. The half life is about 4.6 hours. Lercanidipine HCl due to its low
therapeutic dose (2.5-20mg) and substantial biotransformation in liver becomes
an ideal candidate for development of TDDS 7, 8.
In this study we
have attempted to develop TDDS of LH for the treatment of angina pectoris
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Lercanidipine HCl (LH) was
obtained as a gift sample from Aurobindo
Pharmaceuticals, Hyderabad. Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC) from NR Chemicals, Mumbai,
Ethyl Cellulose (EC) and Propylene Glycol (PG) from Ranchem,
New Delhi and Polyvinyl pyrrolidine (PVP) and Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) from
S.D Fine Chemicals, Mumbai, India. All other ingredients used were of
analytical grade.
Fabrication of transdermal
film 9, 10
Solvent casting
technique was employed for fabrication of transdermal
films. Composition of LH transdermal films were shown
in table 1. Accurately weighed quantities of drug and polymer were dissolved in
ethanol at room temperature, PG as plasticizer (30%w/w) and DMSO as permeation
enhancer (7%w/w) were added into the polymeric solution while continuously
starring on magnetic stirrer for 30 min. The solution was poured into flat
surfaced petridish and the solvent was allowed to
evaporate at room temperature. An inverted funnel was placed over the petridish to prevent fast evaporation of the solvent. Films
of 2 cm2 containing 15 mg of LH were cut and packed in an aluminium foil covering.
Evaluation
of transdermal patches:
Physical
appearance 11
The prepared patches were physically examined for colour, clarity and surface texture.
Thickness
uniformity12
The
thickness of patches
was measured by
using slide caliper, with a least count
of 0.01mm. Thickness
was measured at
three different points
on the film
and average values were calculated.
Uniformity
of weight13
The patches of size 2x2 cm were cut and weight of each
patch was taken individually, the average weight of the patch was
calculated.
Drug
content uniformity 11, 14
The patches were tested for the content uniformity. The
patches of size 2 cm2 were cut and placed in a 100 ml volumetric
flask. The contents were stirred using a magnetic bead to dissolve the patches.
Subsequent dilutions were made with phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The
absorbance of the
solution was measured
against the corresponding
blank solution at
236 nm using
UV-visible
spectrophotometer. The experiment
was repeated three more time to validate the result
Table
No. 1: Composition of the transdermal patches
|
Formulation
code |
HPMC:EC
% W/V |
EC:PVP
%W/V |
HPMC:PVP
% W/V |
PG
%W/W |
DMSO% W/W |
|
F1 |
0.5:1.5 |
- |
- |
30 |
7 |
|
F2 |
1:1 |
- |
- |
30 |
7 |
|
F3 |
1.5:1.5 |
- |
- |
30 |
7 |
|
F4 |
- |
0.5:1.5 |
- |
30 |
7 |
|
F5 |
- |
1:1 |
- |
30 |
7 |
|
F6 |
- |
1.5:1.5 |
- |
30 |
7 |
|
F7 |
- |
- |
0.5:1.5 |
30 |
7 |
|
F8 |
- |
- |
1:1 |
30 |
7 |
|
F9 |
- |
- |
1.5:1.5 |
30 |
7 |
Drug loaded in each 2 cm2 = 15mg,
Tensile
strength 15, 16
Tensile strength was measured using modified analytical two pan balance
method. A patch of 20 mm width and 50 mm length was cut and clamped between two
clamps on one side; until the patch breaks weight were added to the pan on
other side. The required weight to break the patch was taken as a measure of
tensile strength of the patch.
Folding endurance12,17,18
The folding endurance was measured manually for the
prepared patches. A strip of patch
(2 x 2 cm ) was
cut and repeatedly
folded at the
same place till it was
broken. The number of
times the film
could be folded
at the same
place without breaking
gave the value of folding
endurance.
Percentage
moisture loss 18, 19
Three patches
from each batch were weighed individually and the average weight was
calculated. This weight was considered as an Initial weight. Then all the
patches were kept in a desiccator containing
activated Silica at normal room temperature for 24hr. The final weight was
noted when there was no further change in the weight of individual patch. The
percentage moisture absorption was calculated as a difference between initial
and final weight with respect to final weight.
% Moisture content = [(Initial weight ~ Final weight)/ Final weight] X
100
Percentage
moisture uptake20
The patches were
weighed accurately and
placed in a desiccator where
a humidity condition of
80-90% RH was
maintained by using
saturated solution of
potassium chloride. The patches were kept until uniform weight is
obtained, then taken out and weighed. The percentage of moisture uptake was
calculated as the difference between final and initial weight with respect to
initial weight.
% Moisture absorption =
[(Final weight – Initial weight)/ Initial weight] x 100
Water vapor transmission
rate (WVTR) 21, 22
For this study vials of equal diameter were used as
transmission cells. These cells were
washed thoroughly and dried in an oven.
About 1 g of fused calcium chloride was taken in
cells and the polymeric patches
measuring 3.14cm2
area were
fixed over the
brim with the
help of an
adhesive. The cells
were weighed accurately
and initial weight
was recorded, and then kept in a closed desiccator
containing saturated solution of
potassium chloride to maintain
80-90% RH. The cells were taken out and
weighed after 72 hrs. The amount of water
vapor transmitted was
calculated by the
difference in weight using the formula. Water vapour transmission rate is usually expressed as the number
of grams of moisture gained/72 hr/cm2.
Ex-vivo
permeation studies19:
Male rats weighing 105-120 gm, free from any visible
sign of disease were selected. the hair on abdominal region was removed using a
depilatory preparation one day prior to experiment. On the day of experiment,
animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the abdominal skin was
excised. The fatty material adhered to the dermis was carefully peeled off, The
prepared skin was washed with pH 7.4 phosphate buffer and tied on the donor
compartment with transdermal patch. Patch was placed
in such a way that the stratum corneum was faced
towards donar compartment while the dermis towards
receptor compartment containing 100 ml of pH 7.4 phosphate buffer. At fixed
time intervals the samples were withdrawn and replaced with receptor fluid.
After 24 hours of sampling absorbance were measured at 236 nm against blank pH
7.4 phosphate buffer by UV spectrophotometer.
Primary skin irritation test 10.
This test is done by modifying the method describes by Draize and his colleagues in 1994, based on scoring method.
Scores are assigned from 0 to 4 based on the severity of erythema
or oedema formation. The safety of patch decreases
with an increase in scoring.
The test was performed on six healthy rabbits weighing
around 1.2 to 1.5 kg. the dorsal surface of the rabbits was cleared and the
hair was removed by shaving. The skin was cleaned with rectified spirit. The patche (F7) was placed over the skin with the help of
adhesive tape. They were removed after 24 hrs and the skin was examined for any
untoward reaction. No signs of erythema, edema or
ulceration was observed.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:
The solvent
casting technique was used to prepare the transdermal
films of LH. It was found that prepared films were transparent, smooth, thin
and flexible. The physicochemical evaluation data revealed that there were no
physical changes in terms of appearance, colour and
flexibility at room temperature at which the films were stored. An ideal patch
must be developed in a way so that it should have smooth surface which should
not constrict for a given period of time. The result of flatness is shown in
table 2, where low value of standard deviation indicates the uniformity of the
patches. It was also clear from the flatness study that none of the formulation
had much difference in the strip length before and after cutting. The flatness
observed for almost all the patches was much closer to 100% which indicates a
very little constriction in the film which in turn was the characteristic of
smooth and flat surface of the patches and these formulations maintained
uniform surface when they were applied on skin for evaluation.
The thickness of
the transdermal films were found to be in the range
of 0.024-0.026 mm among which the film prepared with polymer EC: PVP (0.5:1.5)
had least thickness.
The folding
endurance indicates the measurement of the ability of the patches to withstand
the breaking or cracking during its usage. The folding endurance was measured
manually and the results revealed that the patches had sufficient integrity.
The value of folding endurance was found to be higher for the patches prepared
with the combination of HPMC and PVP.
The tensile
strength tells the strength of a patch while it is subjected for a tension.
From the experiment it was found that the patch prepared with combination of
PVP: HPMC (1.5:0.5) had highest tensile strength.
The data related
to moisture content provides the information about the stability of the
prepared formulation, especially when the inherent moisture present in the
formulation may influence the stability of the dosage form and if the drug is
sensitive to water. The results of the moisture content studies for all the
formulations are shown in table 2. The data reveals that there was a small
variation for all the formulations evaluated however there was an increase in
moisture content with increase ratio of the hydrophilic polymer. The transdermal films were found to contain low moisture which
in turn could help the patches to remain stable for a longer period of time.
Moisture uptake also influences the stability of the dosage form. Low moisture
uptake protects the material from the microbial contamination. So for transdermal patches it is necessary to determine the
percentage moisture uptake of the matrices. The experimental data (Table 2)
reflects that the moisture uptake of the transdermal
patch was low which could also reduce the bulkiness of the film.
As expected
the WVTR was found to be more for the formulations containing the hydrophilic
polymer PVP. It may be attributed due to the fact that because of the more
affinity of the films prepared with hydrophilic polymer PVP towards moisture.
A transdermal patch allows controlling the overall release
pattern of the active molecule through an adequate and appropriate selection of
the polymer, permeation enhancer, plasticizer with their combination and
concentration. The various mechanistic pathways were generated due to the blend
of the polymers to maintain the desired steady release of the drug from the
patches. In vitro release profile is an important aspect for the evaluation of transdermal patches because it can predict that how a drug
molecule will act in vivo. It is also required to approximately estimate the
duration and rate of drug release. From the drug release pattern, it can be
stated that the rate of drug release was rapid during the first two hours
period which might be due to the rapid dissolution of the drug on skin surface,
which in turn can prove useful for the dermal penetration of the drug. The drug
release study of the formulations was found to show the release of drug loaded
patches in the range of 77.96-88.94% as the concentration of hydrophobic
polymer was decreased the amount of drug release was increased. This inversely
proportional characteristic of the drug-polymer resembled the pattern like
release unlike. This may be the result of the initial rapid dissolution of the
hydrophilic polymers when the patch was in contact with the skin which in turn
results the accumulation of high amount of the drug on the surface of the skin
thus leads to the saturation with drug molecules.
Figure 1: Comparison of % moisture absorption of
formulation F1 –F3
Table
No. 2: Physicochemical evaluation of the prepared transdermal
patches
|
Formu lation code |
Weight variation (mg) |
% Flatness |
Thickness (mm) |
Folding endurance |
Tensile strength Gm/10Cm2 |
Percent elongation |
Drug content (%) |
Moisture content (%) |
Moisture
absorption (%) |
WVTR |
|
F1 |
26.50 ±
0.40 |
99.12 ±0.25 |
0.025 ±
0.003 |
102 ± 10.8 |
15.44 ± 0.42 |
10 ± 0.072 |
96.54 ±
0.56 |
2.506 |
2.643 |
0.01692 |
|
F2 |
26.43 ±
0.20 |
98.32 ±0.15 |
0.026 ± 0.002 |
105 ± 6.5
|
15.13 ± 0.23 |
9 ± 0.023 |
96.98 ± 0.23 |
2.134 |
2.574 |
0.01680 |
|
F3 |
26.87 ± 0.16 |
99.10 ±0.14 |
0.026 ± 0.006 |
95 ± 8.6 |
14.96 ±
0.32 |
9 ± 0.045 |
97.35 ± 0.11 |
1.983 |
2.321 |
0.01676 |
|
F4 |
25.95 ±
0.12 |
98.17 ±0.25 |
0.024 ± 0.003 |
119 ± 10.6 |
15.58 ±
0.85 |
11 ± 0.052 |
98.37 ± 0.24 |
2.632 |
2.528 |
0.01704 |
|
F5 |
26.22 ±
0.15 |
100.0 ±0.19 |
0.025 ± 0.002 |
110 ±
12.3 |
15.36 ± 0.56 |
10 ± 0.051 |
97.95 ±
0.32 |
2.628 |
2.632 |
0.01706 |
|
F6 |
26.68 ± 0.12 |
99.25 ±0.56 |
0.026 ± 0.005 |
111 ± 8.5 |
14.32 ± 0.68 |
10 ± 0.025 |
96.58 ±
0.10 |
2.114 |
2.136 |
0.01694 |
|
F7 |
25.83 ±
0.19 |
100.0 ±0.29 |
0.025 ± 0.006 |
124 ±
10.3 |
15.86 ± 0.28 |
11 ± 0.041 |
98.69 ± 0.31 |
2.642 |
2.864 |
0.01718 |
|
F8 |
25.98 ±
0.36 |
98.23 ±0.43 |
0.025 ± 0.002 |
124 ± 11.5 |
14.89 ± 0.27 |
10 ± 0.036 |
98.96 ± 0.15 |
2.598 |
2.802 |
0.01717 |
|
F9 |
26.34 ±
0.15 |
99.52 ±0.15 |
0.026 ± 0.005 |
116 ±
8.9 |
15.64 ±
0.42 |
10 ± 0.054 |
97.42 ± 0.21 |
2.631 |
2.624 |
0.01790 |
Figure
2: Comparison of % moisture absorption of formulation F4 –F6
Figure
3: Comparison of % moisture absorption of formulation F7 –F9
Figure
4: Comparison of WVTR of formulation F1 –F3
Figure
5: Comparison of WVTR of formulation F1 –F3
Figure
6: Comparison of WVTR of formulation F1 –F3
Figure
7: Percentage drug release of F7
CONCLUSION:
LH holds
good promise for administration via transdermal route
for the treatment of angina pectoris. The various physico
chemical parameters that were evaluated helped to realize the suitability and
usefulness of LH to be formulated as a transdermal
film with different concentration and blends of the polymers. The effect of
permeation enhancer (DMSO) and plasticizer (PG) used to prepare the transdermal film were found to be satisfactory. HPMC, EC
and PVP polymer blends have the potential to formulate transdermal
films as they have good film forming properties like flatness, thickness,
folding endurance and moreover mechanical strength. However in a generalised manner a conclusion can be drawn that the
selection of a particular polymer blend can vary the diffusion of the drug in a
significant manner. Thus there may be an opportunity to modify the formulation
composition like the ratio of polymer and permeation enhancer to get the
optimum release for a longer period of time. Considering the experimental data
polymer based transdermal patches containing
permeation enhance i.e. DMSO can emerge as an efficient tool in drug delivery
system for the treatment of angina pectoris, however the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of these formulations at pre
clinical and clinical level is necessary to establish these findings.
REFERENCES:
1. Sanap G. S., Dama G.
Y., Hande A.S., Karpe S.
P., Nalawade S. V., Kakade
R. S., Jadhav G. Y. Prepartion
of transdermal monolithic system of idapamide by solvent casting method and the use of
vegetable oils as permeation enhancer. Int. J. of Green Pharmacy 2008; 129-133.
2. Mamatha T., Venkateshwara
R., Mukkanti K., Ramesh G. Tansdermal drug delivery systems for atomoxetine
hydrochloride invitro and ex vivo evaluation current
trends in biotechnology and pharmacy. 2009; 3(2): 1-16.
3. Sharad K., Govil. Transdermal drug delivery system, Drug Delivery Devices by
Praveen tyle, 1987: 386-417.
4. Chien, w. Yie, Novel
drug delivery systems, Marcel and Dekker Inc., New York, 1987; 2-3, 149-153,
185-193.
5. Giuseppe S., Silvia P. S., Cristina G.
Cardiovascular safety of Lercanidipine in patients
with angina pectoris: a review of six randomised
clinical trials. Current therapeutic research 2001; 62(1): 3-15.
6. Sasaki T., Maruyam
H., Kase Y., Takeda S., Aburada
M. Antianginal effects of Lercanidipine
on vasopressin or methacholine induced angina model
in rats. Bio. Pharm Bull 2005; 28(5): 811-816.
7. Barachielli M., Dolfini E.,
Farina P., Leoni B., Targa
G., Vinaccia V., Tajana A.
Clinical pharmacokinetics of Lercanidipine. Journal
of cardiovascular pharmacology. 1997; 29(P) S1-S15.
8. James S., Kalus
and Michael W. G. Alongacting dihydropyridine
calcium channel blocker for treatment of hypertension 2002; 37: 234-238.
9.
Dang
P.M., Manavi F.V., Gadag
A.P., Mastiholimath V.S., Jagdeesh
T. Formulation of transdermal drug delivery device of
Ketotifen Fumarate Indian
Journal of Pharmaceutical Science
2003; 65(3): 239-243.
10. Jayaprakash S., Halith M.S., Firthouse P.U.M., Yasim M. Prepartion and evaluation of Celecoxib
transdermal patches. Pakistan Journal of
Pharmaceutical Science. 2010; 23(3): 279-283.
11. Sanap GS, Dama GY, Hande AS, Karpe SP, Nalawade SV, Kakade RS,
et al. Preparation of transdermal
monolithic systems of indapamide by solvent
casting method and the
use of vegetable
oils as permeation
enhancer. Int J
Green Pharm 2008; 2:129-33
12. Murthy
TEGK, Kishore VS.
Effect of casting solvent on permeability of antihypertensive drugs
through ethyl cellulose films. J Sci Ind Res 2008; 67:147-50.
13. Patel HJ,
Patel JS, Desai BG, Patel KD.
Design and evaluation
of amlodipine
besilate transdermal
patches containing film
former. Int J Pharma Res Dev
2009; 7:1-12.
14. Rao V, Mamatha T, Mukkanti K and Ramesh. Transdermal drug delivery system for atomoxetine
hydrochloride–in vitro and ex vivo evaluation. Current Trends in Biotechnology
and Pharmacy 2009; 3(2):188-96.
15. Kulkarni RV, Mutalik
S, Hiremath
D. Effect of plasticizers on the
permeability and mechanical properties of eudragit
films for transdermal application. Ind J Pharm Sci
2002; 64(1):28-31.
16. Panigrahi L, Ghosal SK. Formulation and evaluation of pseudolatex transdermal drug
delivery system of terbutaline sulphate.
Ind J Pharm Sci 2002; 64:79-82.
17. Murthy
TEGK and Kishore VS.
Effect of casting solvent and polymer on permeability of propranolol hydrochloride through membrane controlled transdermal drug delivery system. Indian J Pharm Sci 2007; 69(5):646-50.
18. Subramanian
K, Sathyapriya LS, Jayaprakash S, Prabhu RS, Abirami A, Madhumitha B et al. An Approach to the formulation and
evaluation of transdermal DDS of isoxsuprine
HCl. Int J Pharm Sci Tech 2008; 1(1):22-8.
19.
Sankar V,
Johnson DB, Sivanand V, Ravichandran
V, Raghuraman, S, Velrajan
G et al. Design and evaluation of nifedipine transdermal patches. Indian J Pharm
Sci 2003; 65(5):510-5.
20.
Shinde AJ, Garala KC, More HN. Development and characterization of transdermal therapeutics system of tramadol
hydrochloride. Asian J Pharm 2008; 2:265-69.
21.
Devi KV, Saisivam
S, Maria GR, Deepti PU. Design
and evaluation of
matrix diffusion controlled transdermal patches
of verapamil hydrochloride. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2003; 29(5):495-503.
22.
Pandit V, Khanum A, Bhaskaran S, Banu V. Formulation
and evaluation of transdermal films
for the treatment
of overactive bladder.
Int
J Pharm Tech
Res 2009; 1(3):799-804.
Received on 23.08.2013
Modified on 20.09.2013
Accepted on 27.09.2013
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 5(6):
November-December, 2013, 320-326