Natural
Superdisintegrants: Changed Scenario and Latest
Advances
Sudheshnababu Sukhavasi*, V. Sai kishore
Dept. of Pharmaceutics, Bapatla
College of Pharmacy, Bapatla-522101, Andhra Pradesh, India.
ABSTRACT:
All pharmaceutical dosage forms contain
many additives besides the active ingredients to assist manufacturing and to
obtain the desired effect of the pharmaceutical active ingredients. The
advances in drug delivery have simultaneously urged the discovery of novel
excipients which are safe and fulfil specific
functions and directly or indirectly influence the rate and extent of release
and /or absorption. Superdisintegrants are added to
oral solid dosage formulations to facilitate fast disintegration. The plant
derived natural super disintegrants comply with many
requirements of pharmaceutical excipients as they are non-toxic, stable, easily
available, associated with less regulatory issues as compared to their
synthetic counterpart and inexpensive; also these can be easily modified to
meet the specific need. They can also be modified in different ways to obtain
tailor-made materials for drug delivery systems and thus can compete with the
available synthetic excipients. Recent trend towards
the use of plant based and natural products demands the replacement of
synthetic additives with natural ones. Plant products nowadays are widely used
as an alternative to synthetic products due to ease of local accessibility,
lower prices as compared to synthetic products, biocompatible, biodegradable
nature and environment friendly nature. Extensive swelling, porosity and
wicking action of the natural material in the tablet formulation were found to
be contributing its superdisintegrant action. This
review discusses about the development and extraction of natural superdisintegrants for use in the rapidly disintegrating
dosage forms.
KEYWORDS: Superdisintegrants;
Natural gum; Extraction, Purification, Pharmaceutical application
INTRODUCTION:
The proper
choice of superdisintegrant and its consistency of
performance are of critical importance to the formulation of a rapidly disintegrating dosage form.
The choice of super disintegrant for a tablet
formulation depends largely on the nature of the drug being used. For example,
the solubility of the drug component could affect the rate and mechanism of
tablet disintegration. Water-soluble materials tend to dissolve rather than
disintegrate, while insoluble materials generally tend to disintegrate if an
appropriate amount of super disintegrant is included
in the formulation 1. Furthermore, the ionic nature of the drug and superdisintegrants and their potential interactions have
been reported to affect the dissolution of tablet formulations2. The
emphasis on the availability of drug highlights the importance of the
relatively rapid disintegration of a tablet as a criterion for ensuring
uninhibited drug dissolution behaviour. Disintegrants are an essential component to tablet
formulations. The ability to interact strongly with water is essential to disintegrant function. Combinations of swelling and/or
wicking and/or deformation are the mechanisms of disintegrant
action. In more recent years, increasing attention has been paid to formulating
not only fast dissolving and/or disintegrating tablets that are swallowed, but
also orally disintegrating tablets that are intended to dissolve and/or
disintegrate rapidly in the mouth. Most prior studies have focused on the
function related properties of superdisintegrants
with special emphasis on correlating these functional properties to disintegrant efficiency and drug release rate.
Mother
Nature has gifted India with great variety of flora and fauna. For centuries
man has made effective use of materials of natural origin in the medical and
pharmaceutical field. Today, the whole world is increasingly interested in
natural drugs and excipients. Natural materials have advantages over synthetic
materials because they are non toxic, less expensive and freely available.
Furthermore, they can be modified to obtain tailor made materials for drug
delivery systems allowing them to compete with the synthetic products that are
commercially available. Plant products nowadays are widely used as an
alternative to synthetic products due to ease of local accessibility, lower
prices as compared to synthetic products, biocompatible, biodegradable nature and
environment friendly nature. Extensive swelling, porosity and wicking action of
the natural material in the tablet formulation were found to be contributing
its superdisintegrant action.
Advantages of
natural super disintegrants:
Biodegradable: They represent truly renewable source and
they have no adverse impact on humans or environmental health.
Biocompatible and non-toxic: Chemically, nearly all of these plant
materials are carbohydrates composed of repeating sugar (monosaccharide’s)
units. Hence, they are non- toxic.
Low cost: The production cost is also much lower compared with that
for synthetic material.
Environmental-friendly processing: Gums and mucilage’s from different
sources are easily collected in different seasons in large quantities due to
the simple production processes involved.
Local availability: In developing countries, governments
promote the production of Gums and mucilages because
of the wide applications in a variety of industries.
Better patient tolerance and public
acceptance: There is less
chance of side and adverse effects with natural materials compared with
synthetic one.
Edible sources: Most gums and mucilage’s are obtained
from edible sources.
Extraction and Purification of Gums/Mucilage’s:
a.
Extraction of locust bean gum:
The seeds
are dehusked by treating the kernels with dilute
sulfuric acid or with thermal mechanical treatment, elimination of the germ
followed by milling and screening of the endosperm (native carob bean gum). The
gum may be washed with ethanol or isopropanol to
control the microbiological load (washed carob bean gum). It may also be
further clarified (purified, extracted) by dispersing in hot water, recovery
with isopropanol or ethanol, filtering, drying and
milling, which is called as clarified (purified, extracted) carob bean gum3.
b.
Extraction
of mucilage from fenugreek seeds:
The seeds
are powdered using pestle and mortar and 100 g of the powder is extracted with
hexane to remove lipophilic compounds using a soxhelet apparatus. To remove pigments and to deactivate
enzyme, the defatted powder is boiled in ethanol for 20 min. This treated
powder is then soaked in 10 liters water and the pH is adjusted to 3.5 using
0.5 M Hydrochloric acid. The mixture is stirred by a mechanical stirrer for 12
h and then filtered through filtration paper. The filtrate is centrifuged (5000
RPM) and the supernatant is concentrated in vacuum to 50% of its initial
volume. The resulting solution is mixed with the same volume of 96% ethanol and
stored in a refrigerator for 4 h. The precipitated mucilage is separated by
centrifugation (5000 RPM). The collected mucilage is re-suspended in distilled
water, agitated for 20 min and re-precipitated one more time to eliminate
chloride ions and other impurities. Finally the residue is washed with diethyl
ether and acetone and dried overnight at 45°C, resulting in an off-white powder4.
c.
Preparation of treated agar:
Agar suitable quantity of agar powder (5-10
g) weighed and added in distilled water (100ml). Agitation is done continuously
by a stirrer for one day to swell. The swollen contents are dried on a tray for
3 days at room temperature. The dried powders are grinded by mortar and pestle.
Then grinded powder is passed through sieve no.1005.
d.
Extraction
of mucilage from
hibiscus rosa-sinensis:
The fresh
leaves of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Linn were collected,
washed with water to remove dirt and debris, and dried. The powdered leaves
were soaked in water for 5 6 h, boiled for 30 min, and kept aside for 1 h for
complete release of the mucilage into water . The material was squeezed from an
eight fold muslin cloth bag to remove the marc from the solution. Acetone was
added to the filtrate to precipitate the mucilage in a quantity of three times
the volume of the total filtrate. The mucilage was separated, dried in an oven
at a temperature < 50
C, collected, dried
powdered, passed through
a sieve (number
80) , and stored
for further use in desiccators5.
e.
Extraction of
mucilage lepidium sativum:
The seeds of lepidium sativum contain
the mucilage around the outer layer. The major problem in isolation of mucilage
is that it swells but does not separate from the seeds. Because of this,
general methods of separation of mucilage are not applicable to separate the
seed mucilage and hence, different procedures were tried for the separation of
mucilage6.
Method A:
In first method (method A)
the seeds (100 g) were boiled with distilled water (1 litres)
for 15 minute and the mass was filtered through Buckner funnel without filter
paper. The retained residues were boiled with distilled water (0.5 litres) for
15 minute and the combined liquid was passed through eight folds of muslin
cloth. The mucilage was precipitated from the filtrate by adding ethanol. The
precipitated mucilage was dried in an oven at 45oC till it was
completely dried. The powder was passed through 80 # mesh sieve and weighed to
calculate the yield.
Method B:
In the second method
(method B) the seeds (100 g) were soaked for 12 hour in distilled water
(1litre) and then added to a blender to separate mucilage from seeds. After
blending for 15 minute the mass was passed through eight folds of muslin cloth.
The mucilage was precipitated from the filtrate by adding 1 litre of acetone.
The powder was passed through 80 # mesh sieve and weighed to calculate the
yield after drying at 450C for 6 h.
Method C:
In third method (method C)
the seeds (100 g) were soaked for 12 hour in distilled water (1litre) and
crushed in blender for 15 minute. The dispersion was boiled for 30 minute and
the mass was passed was passed through eight folds of muslin cloth. The
mucilage was precipitated from the filtrate by adding acetone. The powder was
passed through 80 # mesh sieve and weighed to calculate the yield after drying
at 45 oC for 6 hour.
f.
Extraction of gum from seeds of Lallemantia reylenne:
Lallemantia reylenne seeds were powdered and passed through
60-mesh sieve7.
g.
Mango peel pectin:
Dried mango
peel powder was used for extracting pectin using Soxhlet apparatus. Round
bottom flask containing acidified water [water acidified (pH 2) using 0.5 N
citric acid] was heated continuously at 75°C for 7-8 h after start of first
siphon cycle. Powder to solvent ratio was 1:8. After heating period was over,
mixture was passed through two fold muslin cloth and cooled to room
temperature. Double amount of ethyl alcohol was added to solution with
continuous stirring for 15 min. Mixture was kept for 2 h without stirring.
Pectin was precipitated and filtered through 4-layered muslin cloth.
Precipitate was washed 2-3 times by ethyl alcohol, to further remove any
remaining impurity. Finally, precipitate was kept for drying at 35-40°C in hot
air oven, sieved (#80) and stored in desicator until
use8.
h. Banana
powder:
Banana powder is formed by using banana
pulp, which is mechanically chopped and then processed with hydraulic shear
using a colloid mill, turning it into a paste. Sodium metabisulfite is then
used to brighten the yellow colour of the paste. The
paste is then dried by either spray- or drum-drying, although the latter is
more common because none of the paste is lost while drying. The drum-drying
also produces about 2% more powder and also dries it more thoroughly.
Regardless of the drying process banana powder can generally only stay fresh on
the shelf for about a year before passing its expiration date9.
i.
Plantago ovata:
Mucilage
was isolated by soaking seeds of Plantago ovata in
water (20-30 times) for at least 48 hrs, boiled for 2 hrs subsequently mucilage
was released into the water completely. With the help of the muslin cloth the
mucilage was squeezed out and separated from seeds. The mucilage collected and
precipitated using 3 times of 95% ethanol. Collected mucilage was dried in the
oven at 50-55°. Dried mucilage was scraped and powdered using pestle and mortar.
Powder was sieved using mesh no.60 10.
j.
Preparation of modified gum karaya:
Powdered gum was taken in a porcelain bowl
and subjected of heating using sand bath for different time periods at
different temperatures. The results of swelling capacity and viscosity studies
revealed that the modified forms possessed swelling property similar to GK, but
viscosity was decreased as a function of temperature and time period of
heating. However, it was observed that GK samples were charred, when heated at
140 oC. In the preparation of modified
form of GK, no further change in viscosity of GK was observed by heating it at
120 oC for more than 2h. Hence, these
conditions of heating at 120 oC for 2h
were selected to prepare modified form of GK. The prepared modified form of GK
was finally re-sieved (100 mesh) and stored in airtight container at 25 oC 11.
k.
Preparation of Modified Tragacanth:
Tragacanth(5g), tween80(0.05g) and hydrogen
peroxide(30% w/v) solution(1ml) were taken in 100ml of purified water and
boiled for 15min. The mixture was allowed to cool and settle. The clear
supernatant fluid was decanted and the sediment was washed repeatedly with
water. Finally the sediment was collected by centrifuging at 2500RPM and dried
at 80oC for 4hrs. The dried product was ground to fine powder and
passed through mesh no.200 12.
Selecting the superdisintegrant:
Although
the super disintegrant primarily affects the rate of
disintegration, when used at high levels it can also affect mouth feel, tablet
hardness, and friability. Thus, several factors must be considered when
selecting a superdisintegrant 13.
Disintegration:
The super disintegrant must quickly wick saliva into the tablet to
generate the volume expansion and hydrostatic pressures necessary to provide
rapid disintegration in the mouth.
Compactability: When
manufacturing rapidly disintegrating
dosage form, it is desirable to have tablets with acceptable hardness at
a given compression force to produce robust tablets that avoid the need to use
specialized packaging while maximizing production speed. Thus, a more
compactable superdisintegrant will produce stronger,
less-friable tablets.
|
S.NO |
NATURAL SUPERDISINTEGRANT |
DRUG |
|
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. |
Locust Bean Gum Fenugreek seed mucilage Modified Agar Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Lepidium sativum Lallemantia reylenne Mango Peel Pectin Banana powder Plantago ovata Gum Karaya Modified Tragacanth |
Nimesulide Metformin HCL Famotidine,Ondansetron HCL Famotidine,Tramadol HCL
& Levofloxacin Nimesulide Nimesulide Diclofenac Sodium Ondansetron HCL Carbamazepine, Tramadol HCL & Levofloxacin,
Aceclofenac, Amlodipine besylate,
candesartan cilexetil,
Granisetron Hydrochloride, Prochlorperazine
maleate. Ondansetron HCL, Nimodipine Paracetamol, Piroxicam, Sulphamethoxazole. |
Mouth
feel: To achieve patient
compliance, rapidly disintegrating
dosage forms must provide a palatable experience to the patient. Large
particles can result in a gritty feeling in the mouth. Thus, small particles
are preferred.
Flow: As with all direct compression tablet
formulations, attaining good flow and content uniformity is important to
achieving the required dosage per unit. In typical tablet formulations, superdisintegrants are used at 2–5 wt % of the tablet
formulation. With rapidly
disintegrating dosage forms, superdisintegrant
levels can be significantly higher. At these higher use levels, the flow
properties of the superdisintegrant are more
important because it makes a greater contribution to the flow characteristics
of the total blend.
The selection
of the optimal superdisintegrant for a formulation
depends on a consideration of the combined effects of all of these factors.
Evaluating
physical characteristics of natural super disintegrants:
For excipient analysis, analytical techniques can be classified
according to the type of information generated 14.
Structural: Gums and mucilages
are polysaccharides and contain sugars. So, confirmation of the different
sugars is carried out by chromatography and structure elucidation can be
carried out by NMR and mass spectroscopy.
Purity: To determine the purity of the selected gum and mucilage,
tests for alkaloids, glycosides, carbohydrates, flavanoids,
steroids, amino acids, terpenes, saponins,
oils and fats, and tannins and phenols are carried out.
Impurity profile: Testing for impurities must be carried out
using suitable analytical techniques.
Physico-chemical
properties: Colour, odour, shape, taste,
touch, texture, solubility, pH, swelling index, loss on drying, hygroscopic
nature, angle of repose, bulk and true densities, porosity and surface tension.
Different ash values are also estimated. The microbial load and presence of
specific pathogens are also determined. In
vitro cytotoxicity is also determined. Gums
and mucilages are highly viscous in nature. So, the
rheological properties of excipients are important criteria for deciding their
commercial use. The flow behaviour of the samples is
determined.
Toxicity: The acute toxicity of gums and mucilages
are determined by the followings fixed dose method as per OECD guideline No.
425. A sub-acute toxicity study, determination of the LD50 etc., is carried out
in rats and guinepigs of both sexes.
Once
analysis is complete, determination of the structure, composition and impurity
profile enables a scientific dossier to be prepared describing the excipient. This information is of value for the regulatory
dossier of the final pharmaceutical product that would contain the given excipient. Finally, gums and mucialges
are added to pharmaceutical formulations. So a compatibility study is
important. The compatibility studies of gum/mucilage/ drugs are performed using
spectrophotometry/FTIR/DSC.
CONCLUSION:
The natural materials have been extensively
used in the field of drug delivery because they are readily available,
cost-effective, eco-friendly, capable of multitude of chemical modifications,
potentially degradable and compatible due to their natural origin. Overviews of
various types of natural Superdisintegrants which are
available have been discussed. The ease of availability of these agents and the
simplicity in the direct compression process suggest that their use would be a
more economic alternative in the preparation of rapidly disintegrating dosage form than the synthetic Superdisintegrants.
REFERENCES:
1.
Johnson
J. R, Wang L. H, Gordon M. S, Chowhan Z. T. Effect of
formulation solubility and hygroscopicity on
disintegrating efficiency in tablets prepared by wet granulation. Journal
of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 80;
1991: 469–471.
2.
Chien Y.
W, Van Nostrand P, Hurwitz
A. R, Shami E. G. Drug–disintegrant
interactions: binding of oxymorphone derivatives. Journal
of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 70; 1981: 709–710.
3.
Malik K, Arora G, Singh I. Locust bean Gum as Superdisintegrant
– Formulation and Evaluation of Nimesulide Orodispersible Tablets. Polimery w Medycynie. 41(1); 2011: 17-28.
4.
Ravi Kumar, Swati Patil, Patil M. B, Sachin Patil R, Mahesh Paschapur S. Isolation and Evaluation of Disintegrant Properties of Fenugreek Seed Mucilage. International Journal of PharmTech
Research. 1(4); 2009: 982-996.
5.
Halakatti Prabhu K, Omer Shaista, Gulgannavar Rajanna S, Patwari Pranesh K. Formulation
And Evaluation Of Mouth Disintegrating Tablets Of Famotidine
By Using Hibiscus Rosa-Sinensis Mucilage And Treated
Agar. International journal of research
in ayurveda & pharmacy. 1 (2); 2010: 497 –
505.
6.
Patel H. H, Kardile D, Puvar A. N, Prajapati R. K, Patel M. R.
Lepedium Sativum:
Natural Superdisintegrant for Fast Dissolving
Technology. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Applied Sciences.1
(3); 2010: 56-62.
7.
Karan malik,
Gurpreet arora, Inderbir singh, Sandeep arora. Lallemantia reylenne seeds as superdisintegrant: Formulation and evaluation of nimesulide orodispersible
tablets. International journal of pharmaceutical investigation. Vol 1(3); July 2011: 192-198.
8.
Rishabha Malviya, Pranati Srivastava, Mayank Bansal, Pramod Kumar Sharma. Mango peel pectin as a superdisintegrating agent. Journal
of Scientific & Industrial Research. Vol. 69; September 2010: 688-690.
9.
Arunkumar Nagalingam, GowthamaRajan Kuppusamy, Prabhakaran Lakshmanan, Malaiarasan Arunachalam, Sasidharan Veeraraghavan, Sendhil Dhanabalan.
Development of a patient friendly dosage form using a
natural excipients. Journal
of Pharmacy Research. 4(4); 2011:1216-1218.
10.
Gokul Ghenge, Pande S.D, Anwar Ahmad, Lalit Jejurkar, Tushar Birari. Development and
Characterization of Fast Disintegrating Tablet of Amlodipine
besylate using Mucilage of Plantago
ovata as a Natural Superdisintegrant.
International Journal of PharmTech Research. Vol.
3(2); April-June 2011: 938-945.
11. Murali Mohan Babu G.V,
Prasad Ch. D.S, Ramana Murthy K.V. Evaluation of Modified Gum Karaya as Carrier for the Dissolution Enhancement of Poorly
Water-Soluble Drug Nimodipine. International journal of Pharmaceutics. 234; 2002:1-17.
12. Chowdary K.P.R, Murali
Krishna M.N, Tripura Sundari P. Evaluation of
modified tragacanth as superdisintegrant
in tablets. International Journal of
Pharmaceutical Excipients. Vol: 5(2); April –
June 2006:49-52.
13. Bi YX, Sunada H, Yonezawa
Y, Danjo K. Evaluation of rapidly disintegrating
tablets prepared by a direct compression method. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy. 25(5); 1999:571-581.
14. Girish Jani K, Dhiren Shah P, Vipul Prajapati D, Vineet Jain C. Gums and mucilages:
versatile excipients for pharmaceutical formulations. Asian
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 4 (5); 2009: 309-323.
Received on 25.01.2012
Modified on 18.03.2012
Accepted on 06.04.2012
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of
Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 4(2): March-April 2012, 69-73