Development and Evaluation of Propranolol
Hydrochloride Floating Matrix Tablets Using Combination of Natural and
Synthetic Polymers
Kasani Harikrishna
Gouda*, V. Sai Kishore, N. Balaji, V. Vijaya
Kumar and N. Raghuram
Department of Pharmaceutics, Bapatla College of Pharmacy, Bapatla, Guntur (Dt), Andhra Pradesh, India.
522101.
ABSTRACT:
In
the present investigation, an attempt was made to formulate Propranolol
hydrochloride sustained release floating matrix tablets using dried Hibiscus
rosa-sinensis leaves mucilage and to study its
release retardant activity in combination with hydroxypropyl
methyl cellulose grades. Different floating matrix tablets of Propranolol HCl were formulated. The floating matrix tablets found to
have better uniformity of weight, hardness, friability and drug content. The
swelling behavior, release rate characteristics and the in- vitro dissolution
study proved that the dried Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
leaves mucilage can be used as a matrix forming material for preparing
sustained release floating matrix tablets. The release rate followed zero-order
release kinetics and the data was fitted in the Peppas
plots. The exponential coefficient from the Peppas
plots was found to be in between 0.55 to 0.64, indicating non-fickian mechanism of drug release.
KEYWORDS: Hibiscus rosa-sinensis leaves mucilage, Gastric residence time, Propranolol
hydrochloride, Floating drug delivery, Hydroxypropyl
methyl cellulose.
INTRODUCTION:
The oral route is considered
as the most promising route of drug delivery. Effective oral drug delivery may
depend upon the factors such as gastric emptying process, GI transit time, drug
release from the dosage form and site of absorption. Gastric emptying of dosage
forms is an extremely variable process, due to unpredictable gastric emptying
rate and short gastric residence time. Gastric retention provides, longer
residence time in the stomach that improves bioavailability for drugs that are
readily absorbed upon release in the GI tract1. These
drugs can be delivered ideally by slow release from the stomach. Floating drug
delivery, this system basically floats in the gastric fluid because of its
lower density, than the gastric medium. Propranolol, a non-selective beta
adrenergic blocking agent, has been widely used in the treatment of angina pectoris,
hypertension, and many other cardiovascular disorders.
It undergoes high first-pass metabolism by the liver, and on average,
only about 25% of propranolol reaches the systemic
circulation after oral administration. The t1/2 of propranolol is 3-4 hrs.2 Thus, propranolol has relatively short half-life. It also shows pH
dependent solubility; solubility at pH 1.2 is 225 mg/ml, while at pH
6.8 it is 130 mg/ml.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials:
Propranolol
hydrochloride was obtained as gift sample from Natco Pharma Pvt. Ltd, Kothur and Hibiscus
rosa-sinensis leaves were collected from local area, HPMC 50cps/K100M, magnesium stearate and talc were procured from SD Fine chemicals
(Mumbai, India), microcrystalline cellulose and sodium bicarbonate were
procured from Qualigens fine chemicals (Mumbai,
India).
Methods:
Isolation
of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis leaves mucilage:
The
fresh leaves of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Linn. were
collected, washed with water to remove dirt and debris, and dried. The powdered
leaves were soaked in water for 5 to 6 hrs, boiled for 30 mins,
and kept aside for 1 hr for complete release of the mucilage into water. The
material was squeezed from an eight-fold muslin cloth bag to remove the marc
from the solution. Acetone was added to the filtrate to precipitate the
mucilage in a quantity of three times the volume of the total filtrate. The
mucilage was separated, dried in an oven at a temperature < 50 °C, collected, dried-powdered, passed
through a sieve (number 80), and stored in airtight containers at room
temperature3.
Preparation
of Propranolol Hcl floating matrix tablets:
Propranolol hydrochloride
floating matrix tablets were prepared by using different drug : polymer
(Propranolol Hcl : HPMC 50cps + Hibiscus rosa-sinensis leaves
mucilage) ratios viz. F1 (1:1), F2 (1:2), F3 (1:4),
F4 (1:6), F5 (1:8), F6 (1:10) and drug : polymer (Propranolol Hcl : HPMC K100M + Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
leaves mucilage) ratios
viz. F7 (1:1), F8 (1:2), F9 (1:4), F10 (1:6), F11(1:8),
F12(1:10). All the tablets were directly compressed in 16 station
rotary tablet press. All the formulations contained 40 mg of Propranolol HCl, sodium bicarbonate (15%) as gas generating agent,
microcrystalline cellulose as diluent, magnesium stearate
(2%) as lubricant and talc (2%) added as glidant. The
details of composition of each formulation are given in Table 1.
The bulk powder was subjected to various micromeritic
properties4.Values of angle of repose
were found to be between 23.10ş and 26.40ş. The powder blend with Hausner ratio of 1.25 has good flow properties and the
values were found to be between 1.08 and 1.21. These values showed that the
powder blend had acceptable flow properties. The % compressibility was in the
range of 16.24 and 18.74; the values between 12-20
have good compressibility which indicates that the powder blend is an
acceptable range. All the formulations exhibited the desirable flow
properties.
The physicochemical properties of formulated floating matrix tablets viz.,
hardness, uniformity of weight and friability5 were within pharmacopoeial limits and these have uniformity of drug
content1. Also in-vitro
buoyancy studies6 and matrix integrity were conducted, given in
Table 2.
Swelling
Index studies:
Swelling Index
studies were conducted for the formulations F4, F5, F6,
F10, F11 and F12 which passed the matrix
integrity test. One tablet from each formulation was weighed individually (W0)
and placed separately in petridish containing 50 ml
of 0.1N Hcl. The petridishes
were placed in an incubator maintained at 37±0.5oC. At regular 1 hr
time intervals until 4 hrs, the tablets were removed from the petridish, reweighed (Wt), and the % swelling
index7 was calculated using the following formula and the swelling
behavior of floating matrix tablets were represented in fig. 1 and 2.
% WU = (Wt-Wo/Wo) × 100
WU
– Water uptake, Wt – Weight of tablet at time t,
Wo – Weight of tablet before immersion.
Table
1: Composition of Propranolol HCl floating matrix
tablets
Ingredients |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
F10 |
F11 |
F12 |
Propranolol Hcl |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
HPMC 50 cps |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
HPMC K100M |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis leaves mucilage |
20 |
60 |
140 |
220 |
300 |
380 |
20 |
60 |
140 |
220 |
300 |
380 |
Sodium bicarbonate (15%) |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
90 |
Microcrystalline cellulose |
406 |
366 |
286 |
206 |
126 |
46 |
406 |
366 |
286 |
206 |
126 |
46 |
Magnesium stearate (2%) |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Talc (2%) |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
*Total weight of tablet 600mg.
All weights in milligrams; HPMC Hydroxypropyl
methyl cellulose.
Table 2: Results of physical properties of Propranolol HCl floating matrix tablets
Formulation |
Hardness (kg/ cm2) |
Weight variation(mg) |
Friability (%) |
Drug content(%) |
Matrix integrity |
Floating lag time (min) |
Total floating time (hrs) |
F1 |
3.7 |
598.64±0.37 |
0.73 |
100.46±0.4 |
- |
- |
- |
F2 |
3.7 |
598.73±0.53 |
0.47 |
98.38±0.2 |
- |
- |
- |
F3 |
3.9 |
599.85±0.14 |
0.36 |
99.84±0.7 |
- |
- |
- |
F4 |
3.9 |
599.84±0.29 |
0.20 |
99.46±0.6 |
+ |
<2 |
<14 |
F5 |
4.1 |
598.37±0.35 |
0.63 |
98.47±0.5 |
+ |
<2 |
<!4 |
F6 |
4.6 |
599.85±0.24 |
0.48 |
99.86±0.5 |
+ |
<2 |
<14 |
F7 |
3.8 |
589.28±0.47 |
0.74 |
98.58±0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
F8 |
4.1 |
599.19±0.77 |
0.27 |
100.84±0.6 |
- |
- |
- |
F9 |
4.2 |
598.85±0.67 |
0.82 |
99.55±0.6 |
- |
- |
- |
F10 |
4.2 |
589.94±0.86 |
0.84 |
99.48±0.3 |
+ |
<3 |
>14 |
F11 |
4.6 |
599.29±0.75 |
0.28 |
99.58±0.6 |
+ |
<3 |
>14 |
F12 |
4.8 |
599.85±0.57 |
0.47 |
99.65±0.2 |
+ |
<3 |
>14 |
Table 3: In vitro drug release kinetic data of
Propranolol HCl floating matrix tablets
Formulation |
Correlation coefficient |
Release kinetics |
Exponential coefficient (n) |
|||||
Zero order |
First order |
Higuchi |
Peppas |
K o (mg/hr) |
t50 (hr) |
t90 (hr) |
||
F4 |
0.9599 |
0.9367 |
0.9842 |
0.9903 |
3.79 |
4.0 |
7.3 |
0.5744 |
F5 |
0.9635 |
0.9487 |
0.9787 |
0.9864 |
3.13 |
5.0 |
9.1 |
0.5556 |
F6 |
0.9721 |
0.8680 |
0.9751 |
0.9827 |
2.98 |
5.5 |
9.9 |
0.5831 |
F10 |
0.9690 |
0.9576 |
0.9807 |
0.9945 |
3.59 |
4.4 |
7.9 |
0.6337 |
F11 |
0.9717 |
0.9684 |
0.9653 |
0.9852 |
2.97 |
5.5 |
10.0 |
0.6076 |
F12 |
0.9836 |
0.8835 |
0.9675 |
0.9884 |
2.96 |
5.8 |
10.5 |
0.6472 |
Figure 1: Results of Swelling Index Studies of formulations F4-F6
Figure 2: Results of Swelling Index Studies of formulations F10-F12
In vitro dissolution studies:
The release of
Propranolol hydrochloride from the tablet was studied using dissolution
apparatus USP -Type II paddle apparatus. Drug release profile was carried out
in 900 ml of 0.1N Hcl maintained at 37±0.5°C
temperature at 100 rpm. 5 ml of samples were withdrawn at regular time
intervals. The samples were replaced by its equivalent volume of dissolution
medium and were filtered through 0.45 µm whatman
filter paper and analyzed at 290 nm by UV spectrophotometer8. The in vitro dissolution
rates were further tested using pharmacokinetic models. The amount of drug
released vs. time (zero order release plot) was shown in fig. 3 and the in vitro drug release kinetic data was
represented in Table 3.
Figure 3: Comparative Zero
order plots of Propranolol Hcl floating matrix
tablets
Figure 4: Comparative Peppas plots of Propranolol HCl
floating matrix tablets
IR Spectral
Analysis:
IR spectral analysis was
used to study the interactions between the drug, polymer and the excipients9.
The drug and excipients must be compatible with one
another to produce a product stable, efficacious and safe. Based on the IR
data, it was found that, there is no significant interaction between the drug
and polymer as evidenced by the presence of bands due to the corresponding
reactive functional groups. IR spectral analysis for pure drug and optimized
formulation are shown in fig. 5 and 6 respectively.
Figure 5: Infrared spectrum of Propranolol HCl
Figure 6:
Infrared spectrum of physical mixture of optimized formulation (F12)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Floating
matrix tablets, each containing 40 mg of Propranolol hydrochloride were
prepared using dried mucilage of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
leaves in combination of hydroxypropyl methyl
cellulose grades. The results shown that, as the proportion of Hibiscus rosa- sinensis leaves
mucilage increased, the overall time for release of the drug from the floating
matrix tablets was also increased. The release
rate followed zero-order release kinetics and the data was fitted in the Peppas plots represented in fig. 4 and the mechanism of
drug release followed non fickian mechanism of drug
release. F12 formulation was considered as optimized formulation,
with drug release sustained for more than 12hrs than other formulations.
CONCLUSION:
The
present investigation revealed that Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
leaves mucilage appears to be suitable for use as a release
retardant in the formulation of sustained release floating matrix
tablets because of its good swelling, good flow and suitability for
matrix formulations and further the drug
release can be modified by using different hydroxypropyl
methyl cellulose grades in combination with dried Hibiscus rosa-sinensis
mucilage. From the dissolution study, it was concluded that dried Hibiscus
rosa-sinensis mucilage can be used as an excipient for making sustained release floating
matrix tablets of Propranolol hydrochloride.
REFERENCES:
1.
Shivanand Pandey, Viral Devmurari, Shukla Paridhi, Rathanand Mahalaxmi. Development and In Vitro Evaluation of Propranolol Hydrochloride Based
Gastro-Retentive Floating Tablet.Der Pharmacia Lettre, 2 (1); 2010: 75-86.
2.
Swati C. Jagdale, Amit J. Agavekar, Sudhir V. Pandya, Bhanudas S. Kuchekar, and Aniruddha R. Chabukswar. Formulation and Evaluation of Gastroretentive Drug Delivery System of Propranolol
Hydrochloride. AAPS PharmSciTech. 10 (3); 2009: 1071-
1079.
3.
Viral Shah, Rucha Patel, “Studies on mucilage from Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Linn as Oral disintegrant”, International Journal of Applied
Pharmaceutics. 2 (1); 2010: 18-21.
4.
Debjit Bhowmik, Chiranjib.B, Krishnakanth, Pankaj, R.Margret Chandira. Fast Dissolving Tablet: An Overview.Journal
of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 1(1); 2009: 163-177.
5.
The United State
Pharmacopoeia. United state Pharmacopoeial Covenction, Rockville, MD. Asian Edn.2000.
6.
Ravi Kumar, M. B. Patil, Sachin R. Patil, Mahesh S. Paschapur. Formulation
and Evaluation of Effervescent Floating Tablet of Famotidine.
International Journal of PharmTech Research. 1 (3);
2009: 754-763.
7.
Deshpande AA, Shah NH, Rhodes CT, Malick
W. Development of a novel controlled release system for gastric retention. Pharm Research.14 (6); 1997: 815-819.
8.
Patel VF, Patel NM.
Statistical evaluation of influence of viscosity of polymer and type of filler
on Dipyridamole release from floating matrix tablets.
Ind J Pharm Sci. 69 (1);
2007: 51-57.
9.
S.K. Sreekanth, S. Palanichamy,
T. Raja Sekharan, A. Thanga
Thirupathi. Formulation
and Evaluation Studies of Floating Matrix Tablets of Nifedipine. International
Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 1 (2); 2010: 1-8.
Received on 20.06.2011
Accepted
on 04.08.2011
©
A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical
Dosage Forms and Technology.
3(6): Nov.- Dec., 2011, 276-280