Formulation
Development and Evaluation of Capsule Containing Fluclaxacillin
Sodium and Amoxicillin Trihydrate with Enteric Coated
Granules of Lactic Acid Bacillus
Gopal Rao M.1, M. A. Amutha Gnana Arasi1*,
S. Jayaprakash2, M. Arun Kumar3 and P. Kavitha4
1Department of Pharmaceutics,
College of Pharmacy, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Paramedical Sciences, 395, Sarojini Naidu Road, New Sidhapudur,
Coimbatore-641044, Tamilnadu, India.
2Department of
Pharmaceutics, K.M. College of Pharmacy, Uthangudi, Madurai, Tamilnadu, India.
3Executive, Formulation
Development Department, Medopharm Pvt. Ltd., Kayirambedu, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
4Department of Pharmaceutics,
K.K College of Pharmacy, Gerugambakam, Chennai.
ABSTRACT:
This work presents the preparation of capsule
formulation containing ethyl cellulose coated Flucloxacillin
sodium, Amoxicillin trihydrate with enteric coated
Lactic acid bacillus granules. Preformulation studies
were carried out for active ingredients and excipients using DSC, FTIR and
exposing them into different temperature. Preparation of enteric coated Lactic
acid bacillus granules was optimized using two enteric polymers cellulose
acetate phthalate and hydoxy propyl
methyl cellulose acetate phthalate (HP-55) using enteric test and microbial
assay. Optimized one was utilized in the capsule formulation. Formulation was
optimized by changing the excipients. Flow properties of the formulation were
evaluated then they were filled into hard gelatin capsules by hand operated
capsule filling machine. The capsules were evaluated for their thickness,
weight variation, Net content and disintegration. In-vitro drug release and
drug content analysis were also carried out by RP-HPLC method using isocratic
and gradient elution method. Microbial assay
method is used for the spore count of Lactic acid bacillus. The packaging
optimization also carried out by packing the capsules in three different
packaging systems and by conducting the accelerated stability testing studies.
In conclusion the capsule formulation in strip packing is stable in accelerated
condition for a period of two months.
KEYWORDS: Antibiotics;
Probiotic; Enteric coating; Capsule
INTRODUCTION:
Solid oral dosage form is one of the most preferred and
extensively used dosage forms and occupies an important place in the drug
delivery system armamentarium. The capsule provides a tasteless, odorless
delivery system that does not require a secondary coating step. So drugs having an unpleasant odor and taste like antibiotics can
be filled in capsule1. Flucloxacillin
sodium is a narrow spectrum β-lactam antibiotic
used to treat infections caused by susceptible Gram-positive bacteria2,3. Flucloxacillin has
relatively poor activity against non-β-lactamase
producing bacteria including streptococcus pyogenes,
therefore empirical therapy for significant cellulitis
often involves dual therapy to cover both staphylococci and streptococci, using
either Penicillin or Ampicillin in addition to
Flucloxacillin4,5. So Amoxicillin trihydrate was combined with Flucloxacillin
sodium. When the composition of the
intestinal flora is changed, following therapeutic administration of
antibiotics, various disorders may result, such as, nausea, vomiting, colitis
and diarrhea6. Diarrhea is the common side effect seen in patients
administered with antibiotics. To avoid this Lactic acid bacillus was added
with Flucloxacillin and Amoxicillin. Acidophilus
lactobacillus has the ability to adhere to the intestinal epithelia.
As Lactic acid bacillus is less gastric resistant and it
grows well in the pH above 5.0, it is enteric coated. Production of enteric
coated Lactic acid bacillus tablet which may be placed in the capsule
containing Flucloxacillin and Amoxicillin involves
long processing and some amount of Lactic acid bacillus spores were wasted and
destroyed in the tablet compression and coating machines. So in the present
study enteric coated granules of Lactic acid bacillus were prepared, mixed with
the other active ingredients and filled in capsule. Accelerated stability study
was conducted for the optimized formulation.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS:
Materials:
The
following chemicals were obtained from different sources and used as received.
Flucloxacillin sodium, Amoxicillin trihydrate, Lactic acid bacillus, Hydroxy
propyl methyl cellulose phthalate and Cetyl alcohol were purchased from Penam
Laboratories Ltd; Haryana, DSM Anti-infective India Ltd, Deepak Cellulose Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, Unisankyo Ltd,
Hyderabad and Godrej Industries Ltd, Gujarat respectively. All other materials
were commercially purchased and used as such. Reagents used for analytical work
of HPLC grade and analytical grade.
Methods:
Preformulation studies:
Preformulation studies on pure active ingredients and on final formulation were
carried out by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer
spectrum100) and by Differential Scanning Colorimeter (DSC) (Shimadzu DSC-60)
and exposing the pure material and their combinations with excipients into
different temperatures.
Formulation of enteric coated Lactic acid
bacillus granules:
Enteric coating of Lactic acid bacillus
using Cellulose acetate phthalate:6
Cellulose
acetate phthalate was dissolved in acetone; it was stirred properly to get a
clear solution. The dibutyl phthalate, titanium
dioxide and talc were added to the above solution to obtain a white paste. Then
Lactic acid bacillus was added to the above paste to get a semisolid mass and
it was passed through sieve no 20.The granules were collected and then were air
dried. The granules were weighed and were subjected to evaluation.
Enteric coating of Lactic acid bacillus
using hydroxy propyl methyl
cellulose phthalate (HP-55):6
Cetyl
alcohol was dissolved in acetone. Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose phthalate (HP-55) was added and
dissolved to get a clear solution. Titanium
dioxide and talc were added to the above solution to obtain a white paste.
Then the above procedure was followed.
Evaluation of enteric coated Lactic Acid
Bacillus granules:
Flow
characteristics of granules and loss on drying were determined using Tap
density tester (USP) (Electrolab ETD-1020) and
Moisture balance (OhausMB-45) respectively.
Test for gastric resistance on enteric
coated Lactic acid bacillus spores: 6
The
enteric test or gastric resistance test was carried out using the six vessel
Dissolution tester (Electrolab TDL-08L) as described
by USP XX11 Ed. (Page 1580), operating at 370C and 60 rpm in 750 ml
of 0.1 N HCL.1 ml of the sample was taken at the end of 2 hours and it was
transferred into a sterile petridish. About 15 ml of
glucose agar medium which was previously sterilized, melted and cooled to 450C
was added to the petridish. One more plate was
treated as negative control. The plates were incubated at 370C for
72 hours. After 72 hours the plates were checked for the existence of the
colonies. If colonies were absent the granules passes the test for gastric
resistance and vice versa. If the granule passes the test then the bacterial
count was carried out by the microbiological assay method.
Microbial assay of enteric coated Lactic
acid bacillus:
Validated
in house method was developed for the estimation of Lactic acid bacillus spore
count. About 600 lacs equivalent Lactic acid bacillus
spores sample powder was weighed accurately; it was transferred into a sterile
flask. 80 ml of sterile normal saline solution (0.9%) was added and was
transferred into a sterile mixer. The flask was rinsed with 20 ml of sterile
normal solution (0.9%) and was transferred in to the same mixer. The contents
were mixed at about 12000-15000 RPM for 5-7 minutes and it was diluted further
stepwise through a series of test tubes containing 9 ml of sterile blank
solution, by an appropriate decimal dilution method given under.
Decimal
dilution:
600
lacs equivalent sample → 100.0ml → 1.0ml
→ 10.0ml →1.0ml → 10.0ml →1.0ml → 10.0ml
→1.0ml → 10.0ml →1.0ml → 10.0ml (solution A)
The
test tube with the diluted solution was allowed to stand in a water bath at 750C
for 30 minutes (Heat shock) and was cooled immediately to about 450C.
Each 1.0 ml of the heat shock solution was transferred into a sterile petri dish. One more sterile plate was treated as negative
control about 15 ml of glucose yeast extract agar medium which was previously
sterilized, melted and cooled to 45 C, was added to each of the two petridishes. The plates were incubated at 370C
for 72 hours and the number of colonies in each plate was counted. The average
value of colonies was found and the viable Lactic acid bacillus spores in the
sample were calculated using the following formula.
100
10 10 10 10
Total
spore count= Ac X --- X ----- X ------- X ---- X--- X weight taken
1
1
1
1 1
Where, Ac
- Average number of colonies observed
Total
spore count was calculated and was divided by 10,00,000.
The results obtained were spores in million.
Formulation of capsule:
Initially
capsule was formulated just passing Amoxicillin trihydrate
and Flucloxaciilin sodium; Talc and Colloidal silicon
dioxide through sieve no 30. To this enteric coated Lactic acid bacillus was
added, lubricated and mixed and filled into 0E (Elongated) hard gelatin
capsules using hand operated capsule filling machine (Pam Pac 300) having
tamping pin diameter - 6 mm and the tamping pin Length 12 mm.In
next trials Flucloxacillin sodium was coated with hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose
and ethyl cellulose respectively by wet granulation method then the above
procedure was repeated.
Evaluation of capsules:
Capsules
were evaluated for their physical appearance, weight variation, net content and
disintegration test. The disintegration test was performed as per B.P
specifications7.
RP-HPLC
method:
Validated
Reverse phase HPLC in house developed method was used for the estimation of Flucloxacillin sodium, Amoxicillin trihydrate.
A mixture of volume of 50 volumes of buffer and 50 volumes of water was
prepared as mobile phase A. Buffer was prepared by dissolving monobasic
potassium phosphate was dissolved in water to make 1000 ml of solution, and was
adjusted with dilute sodium hydroxide to a pH of 5.0 + 0.1. A mixture of
50 volumes of buffer, 10 volumes of water and 40 volumes of acetonitrile
was prepared as mobile phase B. Mixture of 50:46:4 of buffer, water and acetonitrile was prepared as diluents.
Column
(Octa Decyl Silane, 150 x 4.6mm, 5μm (Luna, C18 (2) or
equivalent), UV detector (225nm) were used in the analysis. Flow rate was 1.5
ml per minute, Injection volume was 20μl.The HPLC analysis was conducted
at ambient temperature.
Isocratic
elution was started with mobile phase with the ratio A: B of 90:10 for three
minutes and the linear gradient elution was started to reach a mobile phase A:
B of 25:75 over a period of three minutes. The chromatography was continued
with the mobile phase A:B of 25:75 for eight minutes, then changed to original
concentration in two minutes and the column was equilibrated for four minutes
with the mobile phase which was chosen originally.(Total time 20 minutes).
In-vitro release
studies:
Dissolution profile:
In-vitro drug release of Flucloxacillin
sodium and Amoxicillin trihydrate were determined
using Dissolution tester (Electrolab, TDL-08L)
(paddle type with 100 rpm for 30 minutes in water) and the drug present in the
sample were analyzed by HPLC method. 900 ml of water was taken in the beaker
and it was equilibrated to 37±0.50C. One capsule was
placed in the apparatus and the apparatus was immediately operated at a rate of
100 RPM. At every 5 minutes, 5 ml of the sample was withdrawn from the beaker
and it was replaced with the water. The sampling process was continued for 30
minutes. The sample withdrawn from the dissolution apparatus was filtered using
Whatman filter paper 1.5 ml of the filtrate was transferred to a clean dry
flask and 10.0 ml of the diluents was added. It was mixed and was filtered
through 0.45µ membrane filter. The filtrates were injected separately. The
amount of active ingredients dissolved was determined in mg by using the
following formula
Test area Standard weight 15
Purity of standard
Amount
=------------- X ---------------- X ------- X ----------------- X 900
Standard 500 5 100
DISSOLUTION:
After
fixing the dissolution time from the dissolution profile data8, the
dissolution process was repeated for 6 capsules. Each one of 6 capsules was placed in 6
beakers of dissolution apparatus. After 30 minutes the samples were withdrawn
from all the beakers and were analyzed by HPLC method. The dissolution time was
determined by taking the average of dissolution times of six individual
capsules.
Drug content analysis
Amount
of Flucloxacillin
and Amoxicillin present in a capsule was analyzed by the above said RP-HPLC
method. 20 capsules were weighed and the contents were powdered. About 100.0 mg
of Amoxicillin equivalent sample powder was weighed and transferred to a 100 ml
volumetric flask. About 80 ml of water was added. It was shaken for 10 minutes,
was sonicated for 5 minutes and made up to the volume
with the same. 5 ml of the above solution was transferred in to a 50 ml
volumetric flask and made up to the volume with diluent. It was filtered
through 0.45µ membrane.
The
test solution was injected into the chromatographic column. The content of
active ingredients in a capsule of average weight using following formula
At WS Purity of standard
Content
=-------- X -------- X ---------------------------- X 2 X Ta
AS TS 100
Where,
At -Area of Amoxicillin or Flucloxacillin peak in standard solution; As - Average area of corresponding peaks in
test solution chromatograms; Ws-Weight of corresponding working
standard in mg; Ts -Sample
weight taken in mg; Ta -Average
net content of a capsule in mg.
Drug Content analysis of Lactic Acid
Bacillus (Microbial Method)
Estimation
of lactic acid bacillus spore count was carried out as described above in
microbial assay methods of lactic acid bacillus spores section.
The
average value of colonies was found and the viable Lactic acid bacillus spores
in a capsule of average net content was calculated using the following formula.
100
10 10 10 10 10 Ta
Content
=Ac X
------ X ------- X ------ X ------ X ------ X ------- X ----
1
1 1 1 1 1 TW
Where,
Ac - Average number of colonies observed; Tw - Weight
of sample taken in mg; Ta - Average net content of a capsule in mg; Total
spores were calculated and was divided by 1000,000. The results obtained were
spores in million.
Accelerated stability studies
The
optimized formulation (F5) was prepared for 2 kg. To know the suitable
packaging system for the formulation F5 the capsules were packed in different
packing systems like strip, blister and tropack
packaging systems. The packed capsules were
subjected to accelerated stability studies (450 C/75%
RH) for a period of two months and the samples were evaluated for its physical
appearance, weight variation, net content, disintegration, dissolution and drug
content analysis at the interval of one month.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
Drug-excipients compatibility studies
Drug
and excipients were subjected to a drug-excipient
compatibility studies as the mixture shown to have no color change and lumping
except Sodium carboxy methyl cellulose.
FTIR Analysis:
FTIR
spectrum of Flucloxacillin sodium and Amoxicillin trihydrate (pure drug) and spectrum of F5 (Figure 3) were
compared. There were no major changes in the position of the spectrum. So
formulation F5 has no interaction with added excipients.
Figure 1. In vitro
release of F5
Thermal analysis:
In Figure 2.
The Tg values of the pure
drugs situated within the Tg values of capsule
revealed that there was no major interaction between the pure drug and
excipients used in the formulation.
Figure 2. DSC analysis of F5
Powder flow characteristics:
The
Carr’s index of pure drugs were observed high, confirming that the drug has
poor flow properties and compressibility9.To improve flow
properties, the formulations were prepared by wet granulation method. In the
wet granulation method mainly Flucloxacillin sodium
was coated with hydroxy propyl
methyl cellulose or ethyl cellulose. Ethyl cellulose coating was effective to
improve the flow as well as to reduce hygroscopic nature of Flucloxacillin10
without affecting the dissolution. The Carr’s index of the formulation F1, F2,
F3, F4 and F5 were 42.1, 26.5, 18.18,
19.27 and 16.87 respectively. The flow property was initially extremely poor
(F1) and it was observed as good flow property in F5.
Figure 3. FTIR spectrum of formulation F5
Formulation Quantity in Gram |
||||||||||
Ingredients in Gram |
LB 1 |
LB 2 |
LB 3 |
LB 4 |
LB 5 |
LB 6 |
LB 7 |
LB 8 |
LB 9 |
|
Lactic Acid Bacillus |
50 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
CAPb |
4.5 |
7 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
HPMCPc |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
7 |
10 |
12 |
15 |
14 |
|
Cetyl Alcohol |
- |
- |
- |
0.9 |
1 |
1.5 |
2 |
3 |
2.5 |
|
Dibutyl Phthalate |
1.5 |
2.5 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Titanium
Dioxide |
0.5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
2 |
2 |
|
Talc |
0.5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
2 |
2 |
|
Acetone(ml) |
45 |
92 |
90 |
85 |
85 |
87 |
88 |
92 |
90 |
|
Evaluation |
||||||||||
Gr
testd |
P |
P |
Ff |
F |
F |
P |
P |
P |
P |
|
Assay
(million spores) |
- |
22.5 |
- |
- |
- |
13.5 |
22.5 |
72 |
81 |
|
Table 1. Formulation and evaluation of enteric coated lactic acid bacillus granules
CAPb -Cellulose Acetate Phthalate, HPMCPc - Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose
Phthalate (HP 55), Gr testd
-Gastric Resistance Test
Pe-Passes
the Gastric resistance test, Ff-Fails the gastric resistance test
Table 2: Formulation of capsule
Ingredients |
Quantity required for a capsule |
|||||
F 1 mg |
F 2 mg |
F 3 mg |
F 4 mg |
F 5 mg |
Stability batch of f5 (g) |
|
Granulation |
||||||
Flucloxacillin sodium |
272.5 (pa) |
272.5 (cb) |
272.5 (cb) |
272.5 (cb) |
272.5 (cb) |
855.57 (cb) |
Aerosil |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.5 |
7.85 |
Hpmc |
- |
- |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
Ethyl
cellulose |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
2.5 |
15.70 |
Methylene Chloride |
- |
- |
Q.s |
Q.s |
Q.s |
225ml |
Blending |
||||||
Amoxicillin Trihydrate |
287.5 (pa) |
287.5 (cb) |
287.5 (c) |
287.5 (c) |
287.5 (c) |
902.63 |
Aerosil |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2.5 |
7.85 |
Talc |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
18.84 |
Enteric
coated Lb granules (320% overage) |
56 |
56 |
56 |
56 |
56 |
175.82 |
Lubrication |
||||||
Magnesium Stearate |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
15.70 |
pa-Powder form, cb-Compacted
form
Formulation of enteric coated Lactic Acid
Bacillus granules:
Formulation
and evaluation of enteric coated Lactic Acid Bacillus granules were shown in
Table-1. The sticking of granules to the mesh was observed in LB8. So in LB9,
14% of Hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose phthalate was used by resolving it
in 90 ml of acetone.
The
granules passed the gastric resistance test and the spore count in
microbiological assay was 81 million spores.
LB9 used in capsule formulation. Out of 9 trials of LB, in 8 trials the
Carr’s index of granules were within 13-21, indicates granules have fair to
excellent flow properties.
Capsule
Formulation:
Capsule
formulation was shown in Table 2. Loss
on drying also was found to be decreased after the ethyl cellulose coating (0.9
%) from 2.48 of F1 to 1.25 of F5. This indicated the coating on Flucloxacillin sodium helps to reduce its hygroscopic
nature.
Evaluation of capsules:
Physical
appearance: 0E sized capsule with smooth surface having blue colored cap and
light green colored bottom. The weight
variation, net content and
disintegration time of F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5 complies with the limits.
In-Vitro release of Flucloxacillin and Amoxicillin:
Due to the powder
adhering difficulty on the tamping pins was observed F1 compacted form of Flucloxacillin and Amoxicillin were used in further trials.
But still sticking problem and poor flow properties of granules were also observed.In F3 then the Flucloxacillin
coated with hydroxy propyl
methyl cellulose (0.9% of the drug) used and the drug release is reduced. In F4
ethyl cellulose was used. Since Flucloxacillin sodium
is hygroscopic, half amount of Colloidal silicon dioxide was mixed with Flucloxacillin sodium in F5 formulation and this dry mix
was then processed in wet granulation stage. The amount of Flucloxacillin
of F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5 in at the end of 30 minutes were 82.5, 83.2, 72, 97.05
and 97.05 respectively. The amount of Amoxcillin of
F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5 in at the end of 30 minutes were,
89.67, 90.4, 88.4, 88.4, 98 and 99.6 respectively.Dissolution
of F5 was within the limits. It was considered as optimized formulation.
Drug Content Analysis:
The
percentage amount of Flucloxacillin and Amoxicillin
in a capsule of F1, F2, F3, F4 and F5 were within the BP limits (Flucloxacillin 92.5-110, Amoxicillin 90-110)7.
Microbiological evaluation of Lactic acid bacillus revealed that all the
formulation passes the gastric-resistance test and the spores present in all
the formulation were within 324-330.
Table 3. Accelerated
stability analysis
M |
In vitro release |
Drug
content |
|||||||||||||
Flucloxacillin |
Amoxicillin |
Flucloxacillin |
Amoxicillin |
LBa |
|||||||||||
Sb |
Tc |
Bd |
Sb |
Tc |
Bd |
Sb |
Tc |
Bd |
Sb |
Tc |
Bd |
Sb |
Tc |
Bd |
|
0 |
98.9 |
98.9 |
98.9 |
99.4 |
99.4 |
99.4 |
100.4 |
100.4 |
100.4 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
100.6 |
329 |
329 |
329 |
1 |
98.6 |
97 |
40 |
99 |
98.5 |
96 |
98 |
91.6 |
38.4 |
94.3 |
94.6 |
88.8 |
300 |
285 |
188 |
2 |
97.4 |
85.3 |
38.5 |
95.4 |
93.2 |
87.5 |
96.9 |
90.13 |
35.4 |
94.6 |
80.6 |
80.4 |
263 |
188 |
150 |
Sb- capsules
in strip packing; TC- capsules in tropack
packing; Bd- capsules in blister packing
Accelerated
stability studies:
In accelerated stability studies the physical
appearance, weight variation, net content, disintegration time of capsules did
not show much variation. Dissolution values of Flucloxacillin
for the capsules in the strip and tropack were within
the limit. The capsules in blister did not comply with the BP limit.
Dissolution values of Amoxicillin for the capsules of all the packs were within
the British Pharmacopieal limit7.
Drug
content analysis:
At the end of a month the drug content analysis
showed that the percentage amount of Flucloxacillin
in capsules in strip was within the British Pharmacopieal
limit (92.5-110)7. The capsules in other two packs did not comply
with the limit.
At the end of a month the percentage amount of
Amoxicillin of capsules in all packs except the blister pack were within the
British Pharmacopieal limits (92.5-110%)7. At the end of two months the percentage
amount of Flucloxacillin and Amoxicillin of capsules
in strip pack were within the British Pharmacopieal
limit. The capsules in other two packs did not comply with the limit.
Microbiological assay showed that at the end of a
month and at the end of two months the spore count of Lactic acid bacillus was
within the label claim (80 million spores) in all the three packs. But the
spore count is greater in capsules packed strip pack than the other two packs.
These details were shown in Table 3.
CONCLUSION:
The
capsules containing Amoxicillin trihydrate, Flucloxacillin sodium and enteric coated Lactic acid
bacillus granules were prepared. Flucloxacillin
sodium granules were prepared by wet granulation method using Ethyl cellulose
(0.9% of the drug) .Enteric coating of Lactic acid bacillus was done with
enteric polymer Hydroxy methyl cellulose polymer(14%)
in LB9. LB9 has sufficient gastric resistance capacity and has required Lactic
acid bacillus spore count in the microbiological assay. LB9 was considered to
be the optimized trial for enteric coating of Lactic acid bacillus. It was used
in the capsule formulation.F5 was considered to be the optimized formulation with
the desired drug release and active ingredient.F5 has shown desired
dissolution. The stability studies of optimized formulation F5 at 400C
/75 RH for two months showed more variation in drug content analysis of
capsules in blister and tropack, but the drug content
analysis in the capsules packed in strip did not show much variation and were
within the pharmacopeia limits. Strip packing system was selected as optimized
packing for the formulation F5.
The
FTIR and DSC analysis showed that the drug and the excipients are compatible. Thus the F5 formulation in strip pack
has achieved the goal in delivering active ingredients in capsules as solid
oral delivery system with maximum potency.
REFERENCE:
1.
Lacman L. Liberman H A. Kanig J A. The Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy.Mumbai:Varghese
Publishing House; 1991:3 rd ed: pp. 374-397.
2.
Sutherland R, Croydon EA and Rolison GN. Flucloxacillin, new isoxazolyl penicillin, compared with oxacillin,
cloxacillin and dicloxacillin.
Br Med J. 1970;4(5733):455-60.
3.
Dollery C, Churchhill Livingstone
and Edinburg Livingstone. The Therapeutic Drugs. Edinburg: Churchhill
Livingstone; 1991:2 nd Ed: pp.A162-A165, 57-62.
4.
Rossi S, editor. Australian Medicines Handbook .Adelaide:
Australian Medicines Handbook: 2006.
5.
British National formulary,
Joint Formulary Committee. British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical
Society of Great Britain.2005.
6.
Santus and
Giancarlo (Milan.IT). Stabilized biologically active
compounds contained in coated microgranules which can
be suspended in alimentary fluids. 1999; UK Patent 5952021:14 Sep.
7.
British Pharmacopoeia: 1V: British Pharmacopoeia commission. The
stationary office London: 2008: pp. A 283-228.
8
United State Pharmacopeia: US Pharmacopeial
Con.Inc:2002; 2514.
9
Michel E. Aulton. 1995. Pharmaceutics-The
Science of Dosage Form Design, Edinburg: Churchhill
Livingstone; 1991:2 nd Ed: pp.456.
10
Raymond CR, Paul JS and Sian CO. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. The pharmaceutical press.London:2006: 5th ed: pp.278.
Received
on 13.04.2010
Accepted on 30.05.2010
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical
Dosage Forms and Technology.
2(3): May-June 2010, 241-246